RE: Alternative investment?13 Sep 2022 23:49
Tony - thanks for feedback. Yes, demographic changes must be a big driver for radical rethink in elderly care and one of the key ways will be automation one way or another - robots, AI, remote diagnostics and health monitoring & disease prevention will all be forerunners of the future here.
However, these do tend to pale into insignificance in the face of climate warming.
In the greater scene, the UK's total contribution to preventing major warming is trivial, even if we do get to zero carbon by 2050, whereas China, US and India and EU will actually have determined our fate long before that.
Recent flooding (following an unprecedented droughts which devastated crops) in China was on a such a scale as to affect its 2022 GDP, ****stan is 1/3rd under water, US and Australia suffer huge and growing wildfire storms and also flooding with extreme weather events, as do EU countries (German floods followed by the Rhine emptying), etc.
This seems to have brought about a simultaneous realisation by the world's greatest polluters that they cannot escape the consequences of their methods of energy extraction.
Trouble is, they all now have the same choice of options - nuclear, wind, sun and sea. As an ex-nuclear industry employee, I favour the first, but unfortunately it's not capable of delivering the solution - current tech is too unwieldy and uninvestable for most nations (and I include the UK here) and new nuclear technology (fusion, mini-reactors) is unproven and some way off yet.
So everyone is going to have to invest in wind, solar or sea power and ways of storing it, and all at the same time.
China aims to double its offshore wind power, adding 328GW capacity by 2025 - needing anything between 60,000 and 220,000 tonnes of NdPr oxide depending on turbine size. Recently, China stated it sees no reason why it should continue to be the world's supplier of choice for magnet materials. China's EV replacement programme is on a similar epic scale. And that's just China...
Supply chains overstretched? - they are going to fracture completely in the next 8 years.
Before that - a Godalmighty scramble buy up the means of extraction and refining of critical minerals by every country in the developed world and developing countries with raw resources.
Just witness how much of the world's lithium supply chain is already being commandeered by China, and the success of Belt & Road in bankrupting chunks of critical infrastructure in Africa. Not to mention the dodgy wisdom of depending on non-aligned countries (Russia - ouch!) in a crunch.
For all the talk of cooperation between the US/Europe as partners in establishing shared and sustainable/secure supply chains for critical minerals, I fear it's going to quickly turn out to be a dog-eat-dog contest, an 'every man for himself' market - the stakes are just too high/urgent to avoid this.
So my message for Truss, Kwarteng and Rees-Mogg is - the clock is fast ticking down t