Member Info for hipete69

Test, test, test is the mantra but surely a test will only determine whether you are infected at the time of the test...? You could in theory catch the virus five minutes after taking the test. Does that mean that we will have to take a test on multiple occasions? Over what time period, a year? And with what frequency, every month?

As a NYCT shareolder i am, of course, in favour of as many tests as possible..as long as no one actually gets the virus that is..

been very weak since the excitement of the announcement....concerns about a fund raise perhaps? (or no one believes the story, which is a little hard perhaps....after all they do actually have a product that appears to meet a real need)

and me Alpha, thanks

Daisan,

Thanks. Yes, i monitor it through vanadiumprice.com, so that's what i quoted earlier.

I guess if there was an uptick last week this will eventually show itself in the spot price

????? vp price this morning showing another drop, from 8.4 to 8.2......!

.....as having been bought during the year. The guy complains that he got in too late (at 177p) and is now showing a loss BUT he is holding on in the hope that this will become a great British company. Might give the price a mini-boost tomorrow.

sorry, not JPM, ...Morgan Stanley

JPM have gone underweight, target price 715 (taken from ADVFN)

i (and others i believe) had the same problem....i spoke with Admin and here is the reply.... "Thank you for the email. The user who posted that made a mistake, they don't have access to your email address. If I was to click on the same link it would take me to my own gmail account. Nothing to worry about, I've removed the post the user made as it doesn't go anywhere. I think he's posted a mail.google.com link rather than google.com. Kind Regards Craig" So, no need to worry......except that the user, believe it or not after having his original post removed then re-posted it with the same link!! i told Craig about this who then contacted the poster who has now been put straight. so, still no need to worry...hope this reassures you

Good luck with it. It's likely to be a long haul, and a somewhat rocky road.

....from stockpedia (plus negative reiteration by Numis). There may be some mileage in this stock eventually but it's likely to involve a substantial fundraising or a debt for equity swap.. Either way, small shareholders will probably lose out. Also, it will take a long time, and there are lots of opportunities elsewhere. (Mind you, the directors bought at 14.75p, so you never know...) From Paul Scott, stockpedia Having had a quick look at these results, my previous view that the company has too much debt to survive as things stand, looks very much correct. Results for 2013 are out today, and whilst the operating profit of £54.9m is impressive, most of that is swallowed up in finance costs, leaving just £13.9m in profit before tax (before huge exceptionals). Net debt only dropped £17.3m in the year, to remain at an insurmountable £302m. The only solution here would be for a substantial equity fundraising, to pay debt down to levels where normal financing charges can be negotiated. Otherwise the bank will just continue to swallow up the cashflow in interest charges. Remember that it's a declining business too, in newspapers, and the floundering attempts of newspaper groups to develop digital divisions can I think be pretty much fully discounted - it's not old companies that triumph in new technology areas, it's start-ups that grow rapidly & slay yesterday's giants in the long run. That Balance Sheet is horrific, with net tangible assets negative to the tune of around £450m! Hence I wouldn't touch the equity with a bargepole, as in my view, it is worth zero, for the above reasons. The company might survive if they can raise fresh equity, but why would anyone pour fresh money in, to bail out the Banks? I'd be more inclined to insist on the Banks doing a debt for equity swap before asking investors to inject any more money. Why would anyone want to put in money into a declining print business anyway? We are in a bull market though, and I'm told that management here are very persuasive, so who knows, they might pull something out of the hat. However, as things stand the equity clearly has zero fundamental value, unless something radical changes, so the shares are just a Call Option on there being some value in the equity after a restructuring, in my opinion. That does not justify anything close to the existing market cap of about £165m at 23p per share, that is lunacy in my view. You do wonder sometimes if investors even look at the Balance Sheet of companies? There might be some upside on freehold property values here, in which case the company needs to revalue them & get them on the Balance Sheet. - See more at: http://www.stockopedia.com/content/small-cap-value-report-28-mar-2014-kmk-jpr-rnwh-82301/#sthash.8zm88Vtk.YNg4ll7h.dpuf

liklihood of a rights issue is one thing, reiterated 9p target from Numis can't help either

excellent!

they say that in a rush for gold the way to make money is to make the shovels and the pit props rather than than dig for the stuff...this article bemoans the costs that subscribers will have to bear to have use of the new architecture in order to make money from their own businesses http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/26014829

results are on Tuesday 26th, I think

that's your job

different barrick!!!

I think it's a sort of price comparison website for businesses. The idea is that you can make big savings by shopping around. ATUK pick up a small cut each time.

POSTED ON iii ON WED - I RE-POSTED IT ON HERE BUT NO ONE TOOK IT SERIOUSLY You know as well as I do that Puma Hotels in which HCP has an approx 50% stake has negative assets of £166m as at end Dec 2012.This will not have changed to any material degree.Most of this shortfall is in loans to the Irish Government liquidator of the failed Anglo Irish Bank which far exceed the value of Pumas assets. Absolutely nobody,including Shore Capital who have been investment managers of Puma since its start,are planning a bid for either Puma or HCP,it would be madness if you wanted the hotels you would do a deal with the Irish Government bank agency,they are desperate to get cash and are likely to settle at present property valuation.Sadly there are no buyers at present.Buying Puma would be £160m more expensive as you would have to settle the loans at full valuation! This share has been ramped by posters elsewhere making totally false statements re valuation,takeovers etc.Treacle29 on lse is the most blatent con artist. LOL I have made £1000's profit here on the back of these posts;its an ill wind........I bought here (I was the first person ever to post on this board!) because I thought eventually HCP might be used as a "shell company" and there might be a modest profit over book value of its remaining cash on hand.(HCP is not liable for Pumas debts-Pumas accounts are not consolidated with HCP otherwise HCP would show negative assets of around £80m!).

TX2's comments are in the public domain. He raises substantive issues about the company's business. These are worthy of discussion. Constantly posting what the price is is not..we can see that for ourselves.