Member Info for Hexam

OSD - I haven't 'fessed up'. I never said FG wasn't in Vegas but I think another poster suggested he wasn't or might not be.

I note you never did come back on any of the seven points of concern I raised about QBT so assume you agreed with all of them. Cheers.

Btw, looking forward to the PRN tomorrow ;-)

"If Boo were to walk away"

What do you mean by 'walk away'? I'm not sure they have any leverage?

Wow OSD, you'd rather do that when you've got the chance, literally, of watching paint dry? Exciting life.

You may find I said something like 'if he was in Vegas', I'm not sure, but doubt I would have said anything more definite than that but go knock yourself out looking.

Not touchy, just pointing out your (continued) lies.

"A few weeks ago they were denying that FG was even in Vegas. How far they’ve moved after being so certain as well."

I think one poster suggested they might not be there - a far cry from a lot of posters being certain but carry on misleading as you see fit.

Surely for Method C any income would come from the chip manufacturer either as a flat fee or percentage of chips sold? It is the chip manufacturer that will deal with the miners.

“These companies wouldn’t have even let QBT through the door if the products weren’t irrefutable.”

The results were so irrefutable that they’ve now been drastically reduced for methods A and B whilst for method C someone needs to invest $20m to make sure.

Possibly Steve but I think it would be more like 10,000 machines rather than 100 (which would produce well under 1 BTC per month). This type of arrangement could only apply to A or B of course.

Well, the flood of glory-chasing, ramping loons that bombarded the board on last week's spike has quickly become a trickle, trades are back to just a few dozen a day and the sp is back to its familiar 0.6p-0.8p range. Looks like it's weeks (or even months) until the next burst of excitement so popcorn away for now as the market loses interest once again. In the meantime the usual suspects will still be insisting the jam really is nearly here this time (like they've been doing for the past three years) and the sceptics will keep kicking back on this, thus leading to much gnashing of teeth, more conspiracy theories and plenty of playground banter. Enjoy!

"Deals around the corner so why would you sell?"

Maybe they simply have a different opinion to you and they don't think deals are around the corner. Or maybe they are spooked by the drastically reduced benefits of Methods A and B that FG has himself revealed or the bombshell that $20m will need to be spent by somebody to design the new chip. Or maybe they just need the cash or see better opportunities now elsewhere. Hundreds of possible reasons for selling as there are with any stock at any given time which is why there are always sells and buys - you don't need to invent conspiracy theories and spam the board with them.

"Basically, I meant - 50 pence and 70 pence per share"

So basically making them first in the queue for shorters to use (see Janiax's post). I didn't know you were such a friend to the shorters ;-)

Until the end of August.

So mrhanji you can't debate (or be bothered to debate) any of the actual points on what is a discussion board for debating shares. I think though it is because you simply cannot think of any decent counterarguments (just like OSD and everybody else). So I take it that none of it is misleading at all. Thank You.

OSD - More deflection. These are the seven points I made and asked if you (or anybody) could dispute any of them. If you can't then I presume you (and everybody else) agrees with them:

That FG has now said Method B gives an improvement of 'north of 10%' rather than 160%?

- That FG has now said Method A gives an improvement of 3% rather than 10%?

- That FG has said that to progress Method C they need a chip manufacturer to take a chance and invest $20m in designing a new chip?

- That in today's RNS they say they are currently collaborating with two ASIC chip manufacturers but are only now about to begin detailed evaluations of Method C and its integration into their upcoming ASIC designs (so some way off and nothing guaranteed)?

- That in today's RNS that the Company is meticulously checking the intermediate and final results of the testing before moving into the final steps that are hoped will lead to the commercialisation of the method-hosted products (so again some way off and no guarantees)?

- That in the interview FG did not say there WOULD be revenue after the summer only that he would like there to be?

- That the sp hasn't dropped 15% (now 13%) today (at time of writing ) after the previous drops so that most of the gains after the previous RNS have now been lost?

Anybody?

2.6x equals 160%

So saying it improves probability of mining bitcoin by 2.6x is EXACTLY the same as saying it improves it by 160% and QBT have used both interchangeably and sometimes even at the same time. I'm not sure what point you are making?

If you like, they did say it would improve the probability of mining by 2.6x and now they are only saying north of 1.1x.

Which point did you challenge? You're just blathering on about how you predicted an RNS (which I agree you did) then that I mocked you for it (which I admit I did) but you keep missing out the bit when you then denied it was a prediction (which I posted below). So leave aside this pointless conversation and tell me which of my seven listed points you disagree with?

This is u

Kaisersuzae - Yes, thank you. So you agree that they have previously claimed on numerous occasions that Method B leads to a 160% improvement.

Now they are saying 'north of 10%'.

"Hexam - why are you invested - if all you seem to do is try and bash QBT and it's loyal PIs ???

Are you actually invested ???"

I've explained this many times (I don't have any confidence in the company but the share regularly pumps and dumps on supposed 'news'). I take advantage of this and am showing a nice profit here (unlike you). You don't have to like a company or believe in it to invest in it and make money. And yes I am invested as I proved recently. I note again you can't actually challenge any of my points (just deflect) so assume you agree with me on all of them?

And I don't dispute you said 'Someone run upstairs and take a box of chocolates for admin - see if anything has been pre logged :)' but you then said afterwards (when I posted the post you've also just reproduced) that this wasn't a prediction that they would issue an RNS, just a 'hope'. Really not sure why you are struggling so much with the actual chain of events and posts.

"Hexam - please go for a head wobble.

OSD - someone run upstairs with a box of chocs and see if there is an RNS - i bet there is !!"

It's not my head that needs a wobble. Yes, you said that but when I took this as meaning you had predicted an RNS you then said:

"and for the record i didn't say there would be an RNS - but i was hoping." and so denied you that what you said meant you were predicting an RNS. So flip-flopping just to make yourself not look silly.

As for my ramblings can you quote anything I have said that is 'baseless' - for example do you dispute any of the following:

- That FG has now said Method B gives an improvement of 'north of 10%' rather than 160%?

- That FG has now said Method A gives an improvement of 3% rather than 10%?

- That FG has said that to progress Method C they need a chip manufacturer to take a chance and invest $20m in designing a new chip?

- That in today's RNS they say they are currently collaborating with two ASIC chip manufacturers but are only now about to begin detailed evaluations of Method C and its integration into their upcoming ASIC designs (so some way off and nothing guaranteed)?

- That in today's RNS that the Company is meticulously checking the intermediate and final results of the testing before moving into the final steps that are hoped will lead to the commercialisation of the method-hosted products (so again some way off and no guarantees)?

- That in the interview FG did not say there WOULD be revenue after the summer only that he would like there to be?

- That the sp hasn't dropped 15% today (at time of writing) after the previous drops so that most of the gains after the previous RNS have now been lost?

For once debate the points rather than just deflect or throw abuse. Happy to be challenged on any of the above but sadly nobody seems able to.

"There will be news coming - last week i forecasted an RNS ( purely by chance ) with a little intuition !!

I also remember that at 8.15 a.m. i was being mocked for my previous evenings prediction - shortly afterwards the mocking stopped :)"

When you were mocked you denied predicting an RNS (it was actually DaffyPicker that predicted it) and so you were mocked again after the RNS for trying to claim you did predict it after you clearly said yourself that you hadn't. You will be mocked again when there is no further update this week - although you will no doubt then claim you hadn't predicted it at all :-)