Member Info for Hexam

“ in my defence got a load of abuse for predicting an RNS”

But you didn’t predict an RNS did you Captain Hindsight. When it was suggested you had you denied it explicitly.

Never o'clock.

"The drivel you post is insane."

It is but don't worry. It's the same poster that set up a new account yesterday posting manic ramps often in capital letters and was promptly banned. Likely the same fate awaits them again soon.

Wozzer - If all the methods (A, B and C) go live with deals are you seriously saying the sp will only be 10p max? That's possibly the biggest deramp of the day!!

"You assume a he? Lol"

Yes. Clue's in the name.

“Pana, you just made somebody look dumb lol”

Yes - himself.

"USA Market close today for Juneteenth holiday ? strange one i must admit'' so IMO we won't see the full affect of any incoming rise from this news until tomorrow"

Which US market are QBT listed on? Besides, they can simply trade today on the UK market if they want to.

"excellent annalist PROACTIVE!!"

It's not annalist (analysis?) - they are just repeating the RNS.

"If QBT earns just £10M net annual recurring revenue, applying a modest 20x earnings multiple gives a £200M valuation = ~40p/share. That’s not crazy—it’s grounded in tech company standards."

Maybe, but it's not grounded in good maths. I think you need a new calculator Wozzers (or to look up the correct number of shares).

Having said that your assumptions are conservative and if (big if) method B does work the sp should be a £1+ (and that's a supposed 'troll' talking).

"So no its not just method A"

I never said it was so please stop misleading. I was just referring to the results mentioned in the RNS and that was just Method A:

"In one example, for Method A, this was accomplished by running two identical ASIC miners, in real-time mining mode, with the same clock frequency and thermal conditions; one mining with its native GCminer operating system and one with a modified CGminer, which included QBT AI software. The results clearly showed that using QBT AI software resulted in producing more pool rewards per unit of time."

They clearly don't have similar output for B or C as otherwise they obviously would have referred to them instead as they are much more significant.

Daffy the 26 and 10 is a simulation for Method B (they haven't actually mined those as they don't have that kind of power).

What they refer to in this RNS is Method A which would be around a 10% uplift if their claims are true and they got results which reflected this. It would be tiny fractions of BTC though (Satoshis) and I'm doubtful they would be large enough to show any reliable difference.

I've just reread the RNS and they do indeed mention parallel testing in a pool and gaining more rewards so my bad but it is only for Method A. The claims for Method A are much smaller than for the other methods and I can't see how that could produce meaningful and reliable results in a short, live demonstration on single low hash miners - and even if it did it is not the method that is going to bring in the big money.

I almost became a believer then - but not to be (yet).

No Jambone, I'm saying it is huge IF they really have shown they get more pool rewards on the live blockchain but nowhere have they said this (unless I've missed it in which case happy to be shown where they do say this).

"Live demo compared two identical ASIC miners.

One ran native CGMiner, the other used QBT’s modified AI-enhanced CGMiner.

QBT’s miner outperformed, delivering more pool rewards per unit time. This validates their claim that their AI boosts mining performance"

This would be huge if true but where does it say they actually gained more pool rewards from live testing in parallel?.

"9 V 2 - enough said !!!"

Yes, mindless rampers will always outnumber healthy sceptics on this and most other boards (and I'm grateful for that as it is exactly what I'm banking on to take advantage of the spikes like I have today).

If I just wanted tick ups I'd simply play to the gallery and come up with the usual rampy twaddle that you and others do so much.

"OldShareDog said - 'your toast !!!"

What about his toast? What's his toast got to do with anything??

Somehow OSD you have got 9 upticks so far for your post which is a mixtures of lies and speculation so let me explain it in 'simple terms' back to you (and the 9 bandwagon jumpers).

"1.) there will be NO placing anytime soon"

I actually think this is correct but we don't know for sure as they may have been burning through money much more quickly than they have before and they have a history of putting out updates like this just before a raise.

"2.) Methods tested and accepted"

Blatantly untrue. The RNS clearly states they are entering assessment so the results are unknown let alone been accepted

"3.) Deals are on the verge of being announced"

Pure speculation. If 2) is successful then a deal will surely follow but at this stage nobody knows and with the sp only a penny there are still not that many yet who are prepared to take that leap of faith (as a deal will result in many multiples of today's price).

So yes, I can deny what you say because as usual it's nonsense.

I have already said it's a good RNS but you have twisted it into something even better that it is not.

"HEXAM - AN OPORTUNITY TO TAKE THINGS BACK AND BE THE BIGGER MAN !!

RNS - TOLD YA"

Hilarious. I've already done the humble pie bit - to daffy- and you didn't tell us there would be an RNS as when I claimed you had you denied it explicitly and said you had only hoped there would be one. Now you are changing back again. Absolute muppet.

To everybody else this is a good RNS and things do look a bit closer - and though I'm still not a believer yet it has definitely got the market interested and hopefully I can take a decent profit on a spike - so keep posting away :-)

Well done Daffy and as QBT RNS's go this is a pretty decent one - and humble pie from me. Not perfect by any means but decent and is already attracting the usual glory hunters!

That is also misleading Jambone as you well know. As Aim and others have pointed out the buy/sell indicator is just formula driven depending on the price and ALL trades are obviously a buy AND a sell.