Member Info for HedgeHogarth

This board is so predicable

I see Simon's goodbye was only an 'au revoir'

Stu the troll is back despite saying he was gne for good and not invested

Micky either a bit grumpy and naive or in the same camp

Stay strong Hemo investors - don't let the agenda of those not invested cloud your mind.

Today was a welcome RNS - confirming all is on track and gives an indication of timelines for clinical trials (I'm pencilling in January)

Micky - keep bleating if you like.

I simply made an observation - you could be Mickey Mouse for all i know

I simply don't trust those that invite a troll to post/respond on here - what possible value is there from that?

Equally, I could be donald duck. If you wanted a genuine answer about Prevail, Cash and likelihood of a placing you would be far better asking someone who over a period of time has proved genuine.

HEMO HAVE PUBLICLY STATED (IN RNS) THAT THEY INTEND TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDING AHEAD OF CLINICAL TRIALS. WE HAVE ALL KNOW THAT FOR WEEKS!!!!! It's not clear to me if that is ahead of Phase 1 or perhaps slightly after.

The view I have taken, is that Prevail have invested after a robust, detailed due diligence process. They appear to be leading on behalf of Hemo to raise additional duns - they are well respected and well connected. Other Biotech investors are likely to follow suit given Prevail's credibility and validation of Hemogenyx.

So, i think it is most likely we see funding led by Prevail

The alternative is a more standard placing like we have seen in the past - I would be surprised if Hemo took this route and if they do I would be even more surprised if they raised at this share price. I think they would wait until after the CH is lifted, trials ready to start and possibly a market update on CBR.

Patience is always needed - a few days in the life of a company share price is nothing

Having said that, some very interesting buys this morning

Time will tell...

This is a forum in which yours or anyone else's identity is hidden behind a member account. So I am not making personal accusations to anyone - as far as I'm aware you've never had the guts to reveal your identity

My observations are purely in relation to the tone, timing and content of posts from a number of alias' that give cause to concern.

I'd love to divulge more - but suffice to say that there is serious concern in relation to activities on this BB - and the regulator has helped join up the dots. Case is very much open and ongoing.

Would suggest that genuine investors and posters ignore trolls and avoid interaction

It's being 'watched'

@Andrew - That's three and counting from one alias

Transparent and a bit wet behind the ears by the looks of it

He's not even heeded the warning

Micky - I'm sorry if you are offended.

However - As you say, you have been here a while and you know what Stu is, you know what Stu does and if you read my post from today you'll also realise there is more to their activity than meets the eye. (which we all assumed anyway)

So why the hell would you address a serious question at said troll - you are not going to get a genuine answer - you will just get the most negative slant and manipulative response he can conjure up - he's a troll, he is here for a reason and he know nothing about Prevail

Starting to think that MICKY is another profile controlled by STU or accomplices.

Beware

Take note @andrew

Aha - Just like Mr Benn, as if by magic 'Stu the Moronic Hemo Troll' appears

As negative as ever about Hemo

Hemo investors (and if Stu the Troll) have consistently called for more updates from Hemo and specifically on timelines. Today, Hemo have done that and I have eloquently shared the timelines of an 'end to end' process run based on the process runs Hemo did 1 year ago.

I'm actually quite glad to see Stu turn up - for TWO reasons

Reason 1 - He only ever turns up when he is concerned that this SP will go up and he turns up here to try, however small, to dampen the enthusiasm

Reason 2 - Members of my HEMO Facebook group will be aware that a certain UK Regulator will be VERY interested in this poster's activity. He mate's profiles (all three of them) have already been deleted and when he popped up yesterday his new profile was deleted within minutes.

Dots have been joined up BIG TIME with help from the regulator. Pretty serious stuff TBH and investigation ongoing. I'm glad I did the work earlier this year to create the dossier and align the activity of certain posters to SP and Trade activity.

Good luck with that trade Pumpky - PMSL

We know the timing of the runs already - you guys should all know this as it is clear from the RNS

18th November 2022 - Hemo confirmed that they ready to move onto the "process qualification run(s)" of which they were doing a minimum of three.

12th December - 15 working days later they confirmed that 1st Run was has been completed 'end to end' including tests

(So 'a maximum of 15 days' for Run 1)

4th January - 14 working days later they confirmed that 2nd Run was has been completed 'end to end' including tests

(So 'a maximum of 14 days' for Run 2)

23rd January - 13 working days later they confirmed that 2nd Run was has been completed 'end to end' including tests

(So 'a maximum of 13 days' for Run 3)

So 2-3 weeks is the answer - and my strong suspicion is they have already started....

Bring it on

Agree that Trials are unlikely to start in 2023 - But I think we'd all reached that conclusion given the proximity to Xmas/New Year and CH still in play.

Every reason to expect them to commence in January :-)

Run will not take a month and almost certainly has already started

Very optimistic that the CH will be lifted in this calendar year - on the assumption that dropping the results of this final run into the IND is straightforward (why would it not be - they already have a format from original IND)

FDA commit to a 30 day SLA to respond - they tend to use this for the initial submission - but given they have already review the IND - the likelihood is they will be able to respond much sooner than 30 days given it's just the lentivirus issue that created the CH.

Nice RNS - very clear and succinct

So many to choose - but if i had to choose 1 it would be....

Prevail's recent investment in Hemo: knowing that they would have ticked all their criteria below before making the investment

Prevail - Investment Criteria: particularly love that last paragraph

Source: https://www.prevailpartners.com/investment-strategy

Our universe of investment targets begins with firms currently sponsoring Phase I through Phase IV clinical trials or studies for approval, marketing and reimbursement. We focus on innovative medical technologies that are making their way through the development cycle.

Next, we apply our patented benchmarking libraries and analytics platform to: Compare candidate trial metrics to norms; (2) discover risk reduction potential; and (3) accurately project cost and timelines. Prevail Partners then performs a thorough FDA review process with the assistance of former senior FDA officials for the purposes of: (1) identifying potential issues and barriers to approval; (2) formulating complex strategies to enhance the likelihood of approval; and (3) estimating the extent of potential additional trial requirements. This removes another layer of risk and improves ultimate chances of success and informs stakeholders for the benefit of patients.

The final determinants of suitability are 1) the securing of third-party market metrics to confirm the economic viability of the drug and 2) the ability to establish a fixed timeline for value creation and monetization. Once these are secured, we can go forward with our investment....

As I have said today on many occasions - It is all about opinions

I'm just enjoying a smug grin at the thought have having caused you the occasional bout of nausea :-)

I'm sure I share the occasional rubbish on Twitter - don't we all. But in respect of Hemogenyx I;d like to think most of my contribution has been value adding - I have done 2-3 bits of research that have been well received by most.

A little rampy - but perfectly and succinctly summed up Drutor

Hard not to be rampy when things are set-up so nicely

For more balance, pretty sure you have blocked me on Twitter HT - so you are no better than Vlad

Reading some of the absolute rubbish that some people post on here and Twitter - you can forgive Vlad for blocking people. I'd be surprised if he has blocked people try to respectfully comment. Do you think Vlad has time to research whether it's someone trolling or a disgruntled shareholder.

For balance, I have exchanged a number of messages with Vlad over the years. I have always found him professional and courteous.

Please accept my apologies SImon

I think i mistook a post you made on another stock (Zinc?) as a Hemo one

Good luck with your next investment

I hope you are proved wrong to sell now - but you cant have any regrets, yours eyes are open and your opinion is your own.

Take it easy chap