Member Info for HeadInTheSand

Yanks, the error you're making here is thinking that the multi-ID boiler room rampers that attempted to grease the path for this "pay the fat salaries" placing give a rat's button about genuine PIs, long-term or otherwise.

Just remember who was pushing that oh so obviously fake Twitter rumour with all their might and main... it's now so obvious why.

...and guess what? The many faces of EchDelta have all of a sudden stopped spamming entirely next door over on AD*FN... can't imagine why...

Mind you, in terms of getting a "keep the lights on" placing away, UKOG's boiler room did a much better job back at the end of June - and got the city boys much easier money. ANGS is having to bookbuild, as Oktane has astutely pointed out.

Well, what has been explained without a shadow of a doubt is the utterly fake Twitter rumour and the recently massively increased activities of the multi ID boiler room posters here and elsewhere....

(Not that there was much doubt beforehand for anyone who's got even minor experience of the AIM cesspit...)

EchDelta...

"At least we now know why 1p never held for weeks.
The stock price has factored in 11% dilution.
End of."

"For weeks"... you do realise what you're accusing ANGS of there, right?

Cynics would no doubt entirely BUT privately agree with you,. However but that's a bizarre but (no doubt accidentally) candid comment to publicly make from someone who's multi-spammed multiple BBs over the last few weeks, to help get this latest "keep the lights on because we're so late on gas" placing away.

Well, that's the least surprising news ever. ANGS was getting desperately low on cash for G&A and non-Saltfleetby related expenses and was never going to make it to possible revenues arising from first gas some time next year.

Of course, this being the largely entirely unregulated world of AIM, I think the motivation behind the substantially increased level of ramping over the last few weeks - and not forgetting the fabrication and promotion of the utterly fake Twitter rumour - has become entirely obvious.

This placing is all about salaries and has nothing to do with Saltfleetby, in my very firm view.

I doubt that the few genuine long-term investors posting here are going to have the members of the multi-ID ramptastic squad on their Xmas card lists any longer...

Classic AIM... and as Yanis said just 24 hours ago, it utterly stinks.

Honestly, the conspiracy theories on here are really scraping the barrel in terms of believability. (Mind you, given that they're stemming from the same sources that so massively promoted the fabricated Twitter rumour a couple of days past, perhaps no surprise there then).

Back to reality... the simplest explanation is always the most likely. Bottom line? ANGS's last RNS announcing yet more slippages on equipment, plus the sidetrack now not being drilled in Jan as promised went down like a rat sandwich. Not AT ALL helped by ANGS not releasing this latest disappointment until the very last minute - that does absolutely nothing for the management's trustworthiness.

What we're seeing now is the fall-out from that - added to the tattered credibility that George and the executive "dream team" have caused through continually missed projections and assurances.

But as I've said, there's still time for ANGS to save itself - though that window is gradually and inexorably closing, so I strongly doubt that any further slippages will be tolerated by the market.

So George... how much gas and by when?

Jesus... seriously? Maybe if people squeeze their eyes tightly shut, jam their fingers in their ears hard and shoult "La la la" at the top of their voices, inconvenient reality will magically go away?

Oktane, please take this as my full and eternal permission for you to take any or all of anything I've ever posted and re-post it without any attribution of any sort required, if you wish.

Back to spamtastic copy n paste again, ED? Really not helping add any credibility to ANGS....

I agree. ANGS's involvement with SFBY will indeed transform the company.

What's still very unclear is... will ANGS be transformed into non-existence or into something revenue-generating?

How much gas and by when?

Rather than trying to remember who got banned and when, perhaps it would be more useful to have a think about how accurate various posters' opinions have been?

I think we can safely say that anyone a more wary persuasion has been proven categorically right to date, whereas those screaming "Strong Buy! Multi-bags imminent! 2p by Xmas!" have equally been proven categorically wrong to date.

And that's because one set of opinions has been based upon verifiable facts and realism and the other on nothing at all, apart from pure self-interest.

That's not to say it's totally impossible yet for ANGS to save itself.., but as every day goes past and as every revised schedule slips by, that looks less and less likely.

So George... how much gas and by when?

ED screams about "being abused"... well, it's immediately obvious that any insults flung on this board are entirely one-way... hurled by the multi-ID ramp squad, because it's all they've got... the verifiable facts simply don't support their endless and purely self-interest claims of jam tomorrow multi-bags. Evidence?"PREEK", "ARRRHOLE", "TWART", anyone?

And if anyone should ant to check out what ED is really like, I would recommend you pop on over to the ANGS discussion board on ADVFN for a minute, where you'll see his alter-egos DaveMarn and Solo4Yous (to name just two of many) in full spamtastic flow, still desperately trying to convince the gormless to put their money into ANGS.

It's a nastily shoddy way to try to make a few quid...,

Well, let's think about that.

I and a few others have been expressing wary opinions on ANGS, based on verifiable facts...

You and your Multi-IDs have been doing all you can to attempt to cajole PIS to put their hard-earned cash into this share, based on nothing at all...

The market's made its mind up...

And I'm the lowlife?

If only ANGS showed any signs at all of being capable of drilling the ground on anything even vaguely near the dates they've continually promised they would...

ED, I really hope that literally nobody has paid the slightest attention to your and your few cronies' Multi-ID rampathon attempts over the last few weeks. I see you're still spamming today for all you're worth next door on AD*FN... have you no scruples at all?

Oktane...

"...as a past investor I have to say the multi ID ramping would seriously make a new investor pause before buying." I totally agree. What's been going on here (and not just on LSE) over the last couple of months has been pretty crystal clear.

As I've said before, blatantly obvious ramping such as has been attempted here actually damages a share's credibility. It's counter-productive.

Then take into account Tuesday's last minute "finally coming clean" RNS from ANGS announcing that the Saltfleetby schedule had slipped yet again (at least in terms of equipment arrival) .... and to add insult to injury, combine that with the equally obviously fabricated Twatter rumour that the multi-ID ramptastic squad shouted to the rafters for 24 hours plus, and little wonder ANGS's credibility is at an all-time low.

I agree with Yanis (who I have every genuine sympathy for) - something stinks here. And to my mind, it's a stench-ridden fusion of the endless rope-a-dope fabrications of the cheerleaders together with ANGS's ongoing failure to ever be transparent.

ED, I chat with those who do hold stock and those who don't. You might eant to educate yourself as to the meaning of the word "sincere".

Leaving that to one side, forget all the nonsense of deliberately created and equally deliberately publicised Twitter rumours. Forget the utterly meaningless puff recently issued by "love for hire" Malcy. The ONLY thing that matters (and it's literally never changed) is... how much gas and by when?

Having issued its umpteenth revised schedule, ANGS would do its very shaky reputation a number of favours by either managing to abide by the latest slipped timescale, or, if said schedule slips further, immediately informing the market that it has done so (rather than waiting till long after everyone's realised that their previous projections are entirely unachievable).

It's really not rocket science. It's about a) being truthful and in a timely manner, and b) delivering on what has been assured.

I am absolutely sincere here. I guarantee you that you really aren't that smart.

Speaking of the rumour crushing the share price...

I have idly asked myself more than once before now if ED and his multiple aliases all over bulletin boards everywhere actually wants the share price to go down? I mean, his efforts to cheerlead are invariably so inept that - as several have commented - they actually seem to do ANGS's already threadbare credibility more harm than good...

...And who was it who "found" this rumour and has spent time and effort trying to publicise it to the max?

...But then again I thought better. He's clearly not that smart.

ED, it's very obvious you love trumpeting made-up rumours by your Twitterati cronies, but also peddling their conspiracy theories? What i find staggering is that such a self-allegedly "well-researched" and "genuine long-term" investor (yes, yes, I know... don't all laugh at once) wouldn't know who ANGS's largest shareholder was.

Perhaps... just perhaps, mind you... you're just a teensy bit less well-researched, less genuine and less long-term than you try to make out?

PS ED your new much-loved Twitter rumour creator is no fan of Mr. Lang, as can be seen from earlier tweets. I'm more than sure you know at least that much already...

ED, as usual you misrepresent things. Yes, EA permit is crucial or this is going nowhere. The market knows this and has undoubtedly priced this in. However granting of approval by the EA categorically does not guarantee project success.