it’s a good day as sclp is holding all gains of the previous two trading days…
It’s a consolidation at high even with low volume as no heavy selling to take profits and this indicates there is another leg up….
A little more patience..
Many here are preoccupied with sclp which is the wrong strategy imv as it shows over the last many years investing here ,some got lucky and made some gains but others are yet to recover their losses. Sclp sp was over 70p and now at 23p . For the investor who did not buy in the raises(dilutions) has in fact lost great deal..and after all its an aim company though it looks very good now but still it’s an aim company and many similar had disappointed investors..
There are many other sectors that are worth looking at such cyclicals,consumers goods, travel and leisure and oil are all very undervalued..
Emotional attachment to one share is a big mistake and over listening to the bb is a big mistake if you want to gain on your investment.
Yes I hold strong here but ready to trade big portions too at the same time to derisk and spread my investment…galvanising my gains..
My last trade here and the gains here were invested as I mentioned here both nearly made 100% but sclp on buying back just above what I traded made around 12.5% in comparison.
This sclp has a good prospect but avoid listening to rampers at the same time as aim can disappoint big time as in my recent mtfb gone bust after passing Phase1 and 2 trials but failed after Phase3…
I will be trading portion of sclp on spikes and re enter it again on retrace …
Simply don’t listen to the BB as many here in my observation have no clue about investing but following others over-talk the huge possibilities and no real strategy but stuck with their emotions to sclp and personal irrelevant stuff ,but enjoy it with the pinch of salts and entertainment ..and then bin it and dyor most importantly and look for spreading your wings..
This is not a deramp as I own significant holdings here at present …
Go and see how many aims bio made it big to face reality..and then realise facts..
So far SAR comes best in my basket of a few bios…sclp did good from my average so far but not the rest and one gone bust!
As always dyor..
You aren’t in my green box and have no intention to do that as in fact I read your posts and respect them.
With regards to the other bio I was investing in and so is you I believe has gone bust due to the BoD decided to do the trials alone with no partnership and running out of money at the last hurdle . This is another example of a small Pharma couldn’t go it alone. Hence partnerships here are essential to progress and passing all hurdles…I am investing here significant sum and wanted to see it flourishing and succeed but not getting over excited of announcing phase 1 trial starting date…it is only a step in the right direction and long to go to achieve its aims with many hurdles on the way.
Science is one step but progressing it to success requires many other resources to get involved .
Let’s not forget sclp before Covidity was not a successful company from the investors point of views seeing the SP decline from over 70p to a few pennies during its journey, you can imagine how many bought high and still waiting to breakeven…
Have I ever trolled you or your postings?
Have I ever been aggressive in my postings to you?
Of course not …so the conclusion is that both now apply to you!
You are probably another hater of anyone makes quick financial gains ? While you are waiting to breakeven..
It feels sadly like many here lost since sp was over 70p basing their investments on science and ignorant to more important issues…sad and can’t make money or change mindsets but getting stressed attack winners in the game…
Science without outside helps/financial backers and collaborations =0 progress and not investable…
I can see your post and other two but the rest are green lines! I select a few posters to read on the bb .
I have added Bermudashort to my greens list now as I have no more time for him .and to stop clogging the bb for others reading repeated personal clashes..that we already witness every day ...I for one don’t like it.
One of my investment strategy is to ignore the trolls on any bb including here…
Have a good weekend..
Bermudashort…if you keep on thinking sclp with 22 employee and limited financial and resources can do drugs trials without collaborations …you are not real and my advice to avoid throwing your money about waiting for years to recover losses as you will need help to change your mindset beforehand..
Its an absolute nonsense to think sclp can manage trials towards fda approval and productivity..without collaborations..!
I repeat again sclp has not enough resources to complete trials without collaborations / partners..
Keep this in your mind for reference….this company with 22 employees and will need huge resources behind it that it doesn’t have at present to finish trials…
That is my final posting with you tonight as we have a very different views on investment approaches and understanding but you seem to try dominating the bb as you managed before our arrival…it is a NO from me.
Bermudashort…no we agree to disagree ( academic means part of resources and declared by the sclp as collaborations and FYI I will always trade aim shares when I see fit as I did here very successfully!…
GL and let’s move on…
This is from sclp RNS 22/6/2021 I was referring too..
“The COVIDITY programme is a COLLABORATIONS between Scancell and scientists in the newly established Centre for Research on Global Virus Infections and the new Biodiscovery Institute at the University of Nottingham, and Nottingham Trent University”
SCLP has no money or enough resources to complete the trials without collaborations/ partnerships ….this is my view ..if it turned wrong then fair enough ..I will admit this..no problem with this either. ..
Bermudashort….you forgot to mention that the recent RNS couple of days ago has exactly did the collaboration in SA as I predicted…
Please read it again….
To help you Bermuda….
This is my post you are probably referring to…” hasiba
Posted in: SCLP
RE: Happy Birthday Covidity24 Apr 2021 09:54
Partnerships takes time! Sclp can’t manage to advance its products seriously without partnerships....as they are still a small fish swimming in their small pond with a bit of cash....the bigger boys are well ahead now in man power and technology to facilitate our progress.
Even if sclp manage to organise P1..so what as this is not the main news the market is looking for but want to see them playing with the big brothers..
If they start P1 without partnerships the sp will rise temporarily then retrace but the otherwise when doing with partnerships the sp rise much faster and continue to rise on hopes and speculations of better success.
I find some posts here are overestimating Sclp capabilities...
The delays are due to looking and agreeing partnerships and that’s why it takes time..
I don’t think sclp will start P1 without outside collaboration and partnerships..
News will be coming and is anticipated by the market reflecting in strong range bound sp for a while now..
I cashed just over 500k shares so far to realise some profits but still have sizeable numbers here...
It all turned right and my average then was as I remember was 13-14 p and bought back just over what I sold between 19-20p generated good profits and lowered my average now to around 12p with my current holdings..
Don’t forget the share price declined after my sells when I bought again…you can refer to all my previous buys and sells to satisfy yourself if you wish..
Bermudashort…” You actually said that Scancell would need massive technical help to run a phase I trial, that you didn't trust them to go it alone and that if they tried it would ring alarm bells for you. So much so that you would get your umbrella out and sell your entire holdings. You also suggested Scancell didn't have any labs.”
Prove it with copy of my post…?
I think you are trying to take what I posted previously out of context….
Come on then bring my post here in its entirety?
I challenge you…
Bermudashort…” You have very similar styles hasiba - anyway great to see that you now accept Scancell are capable of running a phase I trial.”
Haha…there are some similarities ..probably that why I like his posts!
BTW…I can’t recall saying that Sclp can’t do trials as such but I always said that sclp has no resources to complete the three required trials without partnering with a bigger pharma…
Phase 1 trial is affordable but after that I don’t believe so . Hence I total Agree with ananda here ..
No change in my views here and holding stronger now with the new CEO…
ananda….just another opinion here as yours and mine with a style but quite informative and I like it….some sarcasm are ok too but he just speaks his mind though he may like to appear more on the top for now with his high expectations but I respect that too weather he is right or wrong …time will tell…
I equally respect your views too and many others but I must admit that my page today was crowded with green lines of the filtered ones too…
GL and I very much like we have the new CEO as I was getting frustrated with the previous one…but he did his bit and was time to leave to accelerate things moving on…