RE: UFO: EH (Silver) | Hanc0ck (Iron) | Munni (PGM) | Aus Tier 1| *3p+14 Oct 2025 10:31
I first posted the following summary about a year ago, where folks here will each have their own views about how much the situation has or hasn't changed.
Since 2020 I've highlighted that delay, dilution and failure are the norm in an exploration sector dealing in hope. For years I said that our share price may struggle as Hanc*ck was unlikely to deliver revenue before 2024; that, because such things typically take longer than expected, 2025 would be my first date for appraising UFO's progress.
Expressing these views lead to years of insults from those here who, since 2020, have fed other people's confirmation biases and endlessly asserted that we would start mining Hanc*ck "imminently". We didn't receive permits to mine until 2024, are yet to start physical preparations, whilst our share price is over 95% down on its 2020 high.
Our excessive turnover of directors has left us effectively rudderless since 2023. Despite marketing Hanc*ck with very optimistic projections, each prior CEO claimed that they couldn't actually guarantee their estimated timelines. Similarly our transient management continually hint that we are near to securing a deal to finance Hanc*ck but are yet to confirm anything.
Despite months of Chinese stimulus, high grade DSO is down from above $140/t at the start of 2024 to about $100/t as of writing this. Hedging one year ahead on the futures market to late 2025 currently secures about $95/t, whilst for late 2026 that figure is near $90/t. In 2021 and again in 2022, I highlighted how drops below $100/t in iron ore's volatile price were rendering several smaller Australian producers unprofitable. Hanc*ck's 2024 development study predicted op-ex costs of $85/t where, for four of the last ten years, the average annual iron ore price was below this level. Long term forecasts remain conflicted, spanning from below $55/t to over $100/t.
We don't know how close to projected op-ex costs our total expenses will be, nor how any rumoured partnerships may affect expenses or income. Regardless of the quantity or quality of ore in the ground, we still don't know when (some now say if) Hanc*ck may start mining or hit target production volumes. Nor do we know how any revenue generated may compare to monthly sustaining expenditure, initial capital costs, or any "performance uplift payment" that may have to be paid to Windfield Metals.
Alien's journey may have awoken many speculators to the risks of a sector defined by uncertainty. I have always said that the long term potential of UFO's non-ferrous metals is why I chanced a small speculative position here. I remain content to patiently maintain this modest share holding, where the swing from unbridled optimism to angry pessimism now apparent on LSE has not changed my cautious views about the relative risks, potential rewards or probable timescales of the gamble I took.