Member Info for GrumpyScouser

Just take a look at todays trades and tell me in all seriousness this isnt one big *ucking game. I bought shares in PANR today: a decent size purchase and it shows as a sell. I understand why, however I'm quite sure that there are many PI's who see a 'sale' and take it as that. The cumulative effect is exactly what is required......PI's selling in fear and II's hoovering them up. Lend out a few to short in small numbers and voila. Lovely game if you're 'just doing your job'. and using someone else's money to do it ;-)

And £85k this evening...its a long standing pattern

Unfortunately the SFO situation could go on for 5 years from inception even though ZERO charges have been brought at this stage. The SGH claim is likely to take at least 2 years: I make this assumption based on discussion with numerous other shareholders who understand the processes involved. Of course there may at some stage be a settlement however WTG appear quite clear in their position and intend to defend the claim robustly. Personally I'm resolved to a very long slow battle with SGH who have already shown their incompetence in public. In the meantime the WTG businesses roll boringly forward and grow.

Will recommend them. Just saying. Despite the lies https://www.reevoo.com/retailer/1779-ingenie

No prob : the point Is, I wasn't the only one to spot this deliberate attempt to distort the FACTS. Meanwhile in the real world they keep selling policies and renewals.

Rocal....you have deliberately chosen drivel....no surprise though. Instead of picking one with 19 unhappy whiners....use this one https://www.reevoo.com/retailer/1779-ingenie The standard of your research is pathetic or deliberately misleading :-)

Anchorage is the main suspect I suppose.....until we see the next holdings rns which may give some clues

The late reported trades....as frustrating as this is, someone with deep pockets continues to suck up what they can.

Couldnt agree more: splendid update. Its just disappointing to see such massive late reported buys...clearly those in the know were filling their boots.

The data fed to LSE is rarely accurate

Hopefully everyone has been followng the product update announcements from Innocare & Hubio. Plenty of coverage in the press and social media: in particular LinkedIn. Sorry for mentioning the underlying businesses ;-)

I came very close to bailing this week. Two specific things stopped me: - Continued buying by lls who know precisely what's going on and have access to expensive legal opinions - The revelation that the lawyer who ran the PSD sale and knows precisely what happened (and is CEO-elect) has 300k shares on which he is either hurting.......or has sufficient confidence to have bought more recently. I continue to hold about 54k shares.

....getting ready for the next increase in holdings RNS.....same old continues: wont be much left in free float soon

I'm suggesting that inaccurate information is misleading you. www.watchstonegroup.com/investors/shareholder-information/

Best check the WTG website which has been updated. Don't want anyone misleading us, do we?

They will continue to buy everything we wish to sell to them. Perhaps it's just out of charity as opposed to them making reasoned, approved investments which they believe will grow in value. Sit and wait or cut and run: nice simple choices. One is very slow, the other quick.

After a direct request to the company it has been confirmed that Stefan Borson holds 300,000 WTG shares. These are held in his own name on the register. For anyone who is interested.

Been travelling most of the day and just caught site of the price. Some most unpleasant words went through my mind. This is NOT what I expected to see....

Also if note: SGH's insurance has all been used up. If they want to continue with the WTG claim, they'd better be 100% sure of a result or it will cost them fortunes when they lose.

and from another article:- Maurice Blackburn special counsel Lee Taylor was refusing to blink, telling Street Talk: "Slater and Gordon has on a number of occasions told the market that it conducted extensive due diligence for the Quindell purchase and did not rely solely on Quindell's accounts. Today's announcement casts doubt on previous claims about the due diligence process. The problems that have emerged so far – and there are many – might just be the tip of the iceberg."