Member Info for gregthegrinch

There is no way the US will invade Greenland.

It would totally isolate the US.

They can have as many bases as they want and buy up the resources.

The US bluster is to make sure they get the bases, and there is a start at extracting minerals from the ground.

'50% oversubscription'

i.e., the offer was too generous!!!!

IMHO, the last two placings with warrants were far too generous, and we are now paying for that; otherwise, the SP would be much higher.

I reckon we sold to hedge funds that don't give a hoot about any company: it is just about making as much $$$ as quickly as possible.

I think there are a lot of buyers out there, so regardless of the forward selling of warrants, the SP will drift up.

As soon as the warrants are out of the way we will quickly get to £30m+.

Some great posts!!

In all seriousness. I don't know what the short-term price action will be.

We have warrant holders who might keep dumping, or they might now want 4p+ for their shares.

I suspect some big buyers will come in because now the project is derisked and we are seriously undervalued - should be £30m now and a buyout price more than double.

All I know is that sitting and waiting for the big money is now a reality....

GLA

I'm waiting for a dozen female supermodels to knock on my door and say, 'Hi Greg, we have all seen your posts on LSE, we are so impressed, we are all going to show you a great time in the sack. '.

I wonder if GROC have been tipped?

Sellers must be warrant holders looking for a quick profit. They only have so many shares.

New LTH's should come in and soak them up leading to a decent rise.

Sittin and waiting

Now, no reason not to have a reasonable MC of £30m +

Hard to imagine GROC are slapping down the wad on equipment if they do not know the outcome of the mining license.

My understanding is that barring an environmental disaster, they are always passed.

GLA

Tin and Tungsten

'The big money is in the sitting and waitin'

After the recent news the fundamental value of EMH has changed. Right now EMH is worth at least 70p.

So why is it at 20p?

These fundamental value shifts cause an event that some will sell into and exit.

Some, including bots, will see the previous spike and SP fall and assume the same will happen, and go short.

I'm not worried. New LTH will come in, we are seeing a new distribution/accumulation phase.

There will be ups and downs, but the sellers will dry up and then the SP will rise.

Just sit and wait....... and relax.....this price action is expected.

GLA

Https://www.reuters.com/world/china/slow-eu-unveil-plan-cutting-raw-materials-reliance-china-2025-11-28/

When the DFS comes in another rerate. Some fat cat might come in and buy the project for much more.

GLA

From Advfn:

Zeus view: Today’s RNS shows us the commitment by the EU and member countries to sourcing its own raw materials. The key competitor is China. China mines~18–20% of lithium globally and produces ~60–72% of global lithium chemicals using additional imported lithium concentrates; this is where its stranglehold on the industry is demonstrated to produce ~70–80% of global lithium-ion batteries. European EV manufacturers are dependent upon this Chinese supply and want a more secure, reliable and traceable source of lithium for its batteries - Cinovec can be the start of that supply in our view. EMH has a significant stake (49%) in Europe’s most advanced, and significant, lithium project – a project of regional strategic importance and benefiting from tacit support from national and supranational entities determined to deliver domestic sources of critical raw materials to the growing European battery industry. No other project is better placed to serve this demand than Cinovec in our opinion. EMH is materially undervalued and in our view the upcoming DFS will bring into focus for potential investors the true value of Cinovec and EMH. We see fair value at 75p per share.

I don't usually buy after a big rise, but the value is undeniable here.

Well done all those who were buying before the big jump!

GLA

I have bought a small chunk... sittin and waitin for a decent profit.

I expect a wild ride in the next few days as sellers use this news to exit and take a quick profit but the new money will keep coming in and push the SP up.

Hopefully Monday will see a fat rise when the weekend press tell the masses.

GLA

Was the catalyst for this proposal based on the owner worring about a negative outcome in their upcoming legal case?

If he has done something naughty then these are the rules accoring to this AI prompt 'do aim company owners get removed if they commit a crime':

An AIM company director who commits a crime is likely to be removed through a formal disqualification process, especially if the offence involves fraud, dishonesty, or the mismanagement of a company.

While the Companies Act 2006 doesn't automatically bar anyone with any minor criminal record from being a director, a conviction for certain offences is a primary ground for action under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA).

Key points:

Disqualification Order: A court can issue a disqualification order, banning an individual from acting as a director or being involved in the management of any company for a period of up to 15 years.

Grounds for Disqualification: Offences that typically lead to disqualification include:

Any indictable offence (serious crime) relating to a company.

Offences involving fraud or dishonesty.

Fraudulent trading or wrongful trading (trading while insolvent).

Failure to comply with various Companies Act requirements, such as filing accounts and returns.

AIM Market Integrity: The London Stock Exchange (LSE), which operates AIM, can refuse or cancel a company's admission to the market if it considers the company's situation or its directors' conduct detrimental to the orderly operation or reputation of AIM.

Nominated Adviser (Nomad): AIM companies must have a Nomad at all times. The Nomad is responsible for assessing the appropriateness of directors and guiding the company on its responsibilities under the AIM rules. A Nomad may resign if a director's conduct is deemed inappropriate, which would lead to the company's suspension and potential cancellation from AIM if a replacement is not found quickly.

Disclosure: AIM rules require ongoing disclosure of information. The resignation or dismissal of a director must be notified without delay, which would alert the market to the situation.

In essence, while not every minor crime would result in automatic removal, any serious criminal conviction would almost certainly trigger a disqualification process, forcing the individual out of their director role.

GREAT spot Mullins58!

I almost had a movement when I saw the SP rise.

GROC should sell up to the Danish govt for £100m and they should do a JV with Greenland.

Maybe Trump's buy them up strategy will force the Dane's hands, or sell to the US for £100m

GLA

20% = approx £30m extra profit.

Through rose-tinted glasses:

If in the future, 6.5 to 9.10, then a massive rise in income to £219m and therefore £69m profit!

I concede I might have to do a lot of sitting and waiting for that to happen.

They should have an investors Q&A session where these things can be asked.

GLA