Member Info for GreenWolf

Sausage - even I agree with you that there is potential (it's in my posting history for the Pollyannas....).
The posting again this week reinforces why we simply can't debate things on here anymore. Anything remotely non-positive is just jumped on.
It's a shame and someone like you that has held firm for all these years deserves more respect.

Bigeye - your posting history is littered with name calling and abuse (twaat is a perfect example - it's pretty clear what you're trying to say without using a word that will get you banned).
You do nothing but hone in on people you don't like and it's been like it ever since you came on here - how long did it take you after you joined to start targetting people?
And you actually offer nothing constructive about the company discussions, good or bad.

Looking bullish again now. GLA and get cancelling those Netflix accounts!

Bigeye - not sure that's quite how my posting history reads, but that's your opinion.
I was quite bullish about Edl before we signed the CLF and that concerned me given the attributable risk.
You simply don't like me and just call me names and try to undermine me.
Like I said, you bring nothing to this board but name calling and abuse. Your posting history is pretty clear on that front and it's not just been towards me, from whatever date is was you really started posting here.

Bigeye - err, you can work out our gross and net profit per tonne in 2019 from the figures in the accounts. All publicly available stuff, for the second time of posting.
That's if you're not thick and actually understand what those figures mean.
Why do you have to keep calling me names and being abusive? It's all you seem to offer to this board.

Yes - annual reports, Interims and accounts filed at CH are all public documents - and that information is in there.

What "sensitive" information - the information that seems to have been removed with a load of other posts?
I'll post it again then.
Our gross profit per tonne of coal is the difference between our sales revenue less cost of sales divided by how many tonnes we sold.
It's basic accountancy, not commercially sensitive and it's information that is publicly available in our accounts / annual report.
I might start talking about weather regions in Tanzania, because I know about those too. But that's from research, not experience.
It amuses me how one or two sit in judgement on anonymous bbs yet don't appear to want to accept facts.

Nation - we're due at least one RNS before the end of next week - Interims. The ILTL handover RNS may get hoovered up with the interims, but we could get them separately.
So, yes, someone does know something!!

JohnZ - makes no odds really - ILTL could be selling the coal for $1000 a tonne (I know that's a stupid analogy) but it's how much they are paying us that is the key figure.

JohnZ - the 4500t b/e was in a December RNS if I recall. It's slightly irrelevant now anyway as it's not our current operational model.
The important figure is what is the level of gross profit we are getting per tonne from ILTL - that informs everything.

Absolutely Sausage
They're opinions because we don't have the hard facts yet - and neither, far more importantly, does the market.

SCC - that breakeven is the old model so doesn't correlate to the ILTL model. We will get paid a sum per tonne of coal by ILTL, so there is no breakeven level for us and we make a gross profit on every tonne shifted.

But it's those "unknowns" that are holding our share price back.
We're not a speculative AIM investment anymore - we're a producer so, as AM has said, it's the numbers that are important.

And the most important number is our net profit.

Pidster - I don't think it's that clear cut, despite what one or two on here may think about me.
AM said in his podcast that it's numbers that will really get our share price moving and I have the same view - and I have for some time.
It's fine having ILTL on board and having contracts etc etc, but what will move us on is how much commission we're getting paid and how much net profit we'll make once we've paid all our own administrative costs.
That's the key to multibagger...or not - and nobody knows yet so it's pure speculation either way. All we can base it on is facts, and as far as net profit calculation goes those facts aren't yet there.

To reverse our bearish pattern? GLA

Teaye - also explains the 50m sell reversal at 0.0375 the other day - dumped at 0.04 instead. MMs worked that through nicely yesterday - throttle the supply (how many people said they couldn't buy?), drive the demand, bid goes up, dump the shares. Easy really and if you're trading it there's a quick fire 25% plus.
You've gotta love AIM once you know how it's played.

"1000 people instantly recognised me" - yes, I bet they did - we know how it feels on here!

Weather looking good today - checked the Met Office forecast, so I'm off out to pick up some strong lager and then find a dark room to blow smoke up my own backside.

Aerial - but perhaps I've learnt. When was the last time you called me a name?

11. Admit it when you're wrong.
12. Learn to say sorry.
13. Learn not to call people childish names.
.......

Aerial - you missed "weather expert" off that list, thanks. Or was that a Freudian slip...lol
Your knowledge is just not as diverse as mine. I can't help that, although you do have some interesting views on profit.
I'm still waiting for your Tanzanian Met Office link or is that one you're holding in your back pocket for the times when it won't be raining during the rainy season. Im sure you know it doesn't rain constantly for the whole season.
Very interesting how you accuse others of being bully boys.
Yep, things don't change on here.