Member Info for GreenWolf

aerial - love it. If you look at my post aerial you'll see I clearly responded to Esquimo's post first. My response to you was around your "two clowns" comment, which given your posting history we all know who you're on about.
I've been posting over the last few weeks with my honest views, whether they be positive or negative.
Still waiting for your link to the Tanzanian met office.

Esquimo - but it's not a short rainy season - it's half the year.
aerial - "just two clowns remaining" - it's been a pretty civilised board for a few weeks. You're obviously bored too and feel the need to stoke the fire.
How's your weather forecasting these days?

esquimo - I can't honestly see how we're going to achieve a sustained rise, but we might get a spike when we get the right news. Not sure on the 350% in my view. We've six months of questionable weather coming.
It's really only figures and how successful the ILTL business model is working that will push our price permanently on to higher levels.

aerial - you're spot on it doesn't - look at our share price.
Its also not exactly a volume filled day - 1% of our issued share capital would be c80m in trades

The problem is it's just another RNS that demonstrates lack of real tangible progress. There are always mitigating reasons and at times it comes across as yet another excuse. That's been our issue for some time and the market therefore has no confidence. It's almost another false start, although we know it should just be a matter of time before the handover completes.

The H1 financial results were always going to be a bit, how shall I put it, challenging but my view is they are already priced in. It wasn't difficult with the weather and Q2 lockdown to foresee that we would make a decent loss again on operations.

But, what's really changed between the update from 6th October and this morning's RNS in terms of other things? That's three and a half weeks and we're heading into the unknown now as far as weather goes. These delays, for whatever reason, are just making our operational life as a company more complex - we confirmed the ILTL handover in the summer - almost five months ago (first week in June?).

We're not yet building that market confidence back - that's the key and until we get some tangible positives and real numbers, I think we'll just be up and down around this 0.04ish level with an occasional spike, or drop. But I do see that as a positive for those either reducing averages or trading down their paper losses. I can see a nice spike when the news of ILTL handover finally lands, so there's an opportunity at these levels.

Esquimo - there is actually no reason why the interims should be so late. They're unaudited. Companies consolidate P&L figures every single month so they would have had the interim figures for H1 some time ago. I can't honestly see they will give us much cheer, but I consider they're priced in at this level.

I am more hopeful that the reason they are so late is the BoD is waiting as long as they can to bolt in other things, post close highlights, updates on ILTL, Lind etc etc so they only have to release one RNS.

We will see tomorrow. GLA

Crystal - interims (H1 results) must be published before the end of October or we are suspended under AIM rules.
AM said quite clearly in his previous podcast that the thing that would be needed to get our share price really moving was numbers, so it is all about money if we want to sustain any rise. So its been said by our CEO.
We're an operator now, not an AIM prospect and it really is all about delivery and how much money we make.
There is news due on mine handover to ILTL and a slight disagreement with Lind. We restarted production at the beginning of August so we might, if we're lucky, get a post close operations update.

Teaye - there must be a RNS before close tomorrow - it's just a question of what's going to be in there over and above the H1 figures (which we can gloss over....).
There's not huge volume either way - yes, sells outweigh the buys, but we have c8billion shares so there's only been about 0.5% traded today at c42m (according to other more accurate sites!)

Sausage - 10%er ??

Sausage - it's why our share price is where it is - because the market has no confidence left in us with too many false dawns. Until of course we change that sentiment with hard facts - numbers - AM knows that and he admitted it in his podcast.

Sausage - the H1 financial results won't be anything to write home about given the poor weather in Q1 and the impact of Covid shut down in Q2 - we expect that but it surely must be priced in already at this level.
The important bits in the next RNS are really around confirming handover and also putting to bed this issue with Lind. Any post period numbers (i.e. between 3 Aug and now) would be good. GLA

That says more Aerial about what one or two other people are posting about me.

Absolutely aerial - so someone is either reporting them or we're getting increased scrutiny from moderators.
Like I said earlier, I've not reported any posts, so it's not me.

Solley - hopefully

Oh dear bigeye.
When did you say you joined this board? Lol

aerial - sorry to disappoint you, but I haven't reported anything, so it's clearly either someone else or it's been moderated.

It's easy to throw spurious accusations when they can't be supported by any facts.

Bigeye - but there's nothing wrong with that. The problem is you just get abusive.
You've now gone on to saying my change in tune around the time of the CLF is drivel, but its there in my posting history. Aerial has even pointed out that I did, indeed, agree with some of his posting in the past. I've gone from bullish to bearish because as an operational company, we can't make enough money to cover our costs. Its black and white in our accounts - its fact.
You do understand what death spiral financing is? You do understand that you can only have as much debt as a company as you can adequately service that Debt?
You do understand the fundamental differences in a P&L moving from a prospective to operational model?
Or is it you simply don't, or don't choose to want to?
You have targeted individuals on here from within a few weeks of you "officially" announcing your arrival and you've continued to do it ever since.
Like I've said your posts predominantly bring nothing to this board but abuse and offensive names - its in your history.
Its almost as though you joined simply to be a disruptor.

Sausage - your post at 2232 last night explains exactly why people are targeted, because those doing it hope that person will simply walk away. That's why the debate has all but gone.
That's not sly though bigeye is it? A bit like you announcing you had joined this board, when secretly you were already here....sure it's not you who's really someone else?
Clearly the "was" in my post should have been "wasnt". Your usual trick of extracting just what you want from others posts.
Mike Gatting used a phrase once.....its one rule for one, one rule for another. Even unquestionable facts are sometimes a focus of disagreement - I wonder why.

Aerial - there was plenty of name calling years ago even when I was on this board. The posting history and facts are there. Don't make things up - you'll be talking about weather next....lol

How's the weather looking in Sumbawanga aerial? Thunderstorms tomorrow- we must be heading for the rainy season. Still waiting for your link to the Tanzanian Met Office...lol