Member Info for GreenWolf

Nation - 8billion shares, we have fallen over 90% from just three years ago and our nominal value is 0.02.
Nobody is deramping or shorting Edenville at these levels. Anyone who might have been shorting would have closed out a long, long time back.
Sausage made the a very pertinent point earlier on - the fundamentals are not yet in place.

Crystal - now you are starting to see where Lind sit in this. They are a front, a broker of sorts.
They manage a number of funds, such as the Australian Special Opportunity Fund (I think there's also a Canadian one)

They don't call the shots.

The Debenture doc can be hard work (my download is 39 pages though?) but the interesting clauses are Clause 13 onwards - from page 19 in mine.

hobione - obviously a long term hold for you then.
Congrats on your 12.5% in one hour.

Crystal - and perhaps there was a reason that my own sentiment changed on this share when we signed up to the CLF almost exactly two years ago.
If you're interested in how much we've signed over the crown jewels, have a quick flick through the Debenture document on the Companies House website

I'm not entirely sure how anyone who has been invested in here longer than two minutes can possibly see any tangible positives in the words of that RNS.

No progress since 6 October on work permits (that's almost a direct copy of the previous update). - are there really that many people trying to get work permits to enter Tanzania?

More talk of us fulfilling orders - but we've made losses on every tonne of coal we have sold since October 2017 - the Edenville operator model is loss making

We've now passed the deadline of 1 November for ILTL handover, which means either side could potentially walk away

The use of the words "material uncertainty" - I can't honestly say without looking that I have seen those in one of our RNSs before - but it's really not a good phrase to be trumpeting to the market

But.....
Reading the board over the last few weeks, new names appearing, continued talk of placing etc etc
I'm ready for a huge discounted raise, a subsequent spike for IIs to offload and some PIs get holding more of the baby. Not that we've seen that before.....

Alistair - I'll free up some funds for a raise at 0.02 as long as I can offload them at 50% / 100% plus along with IIs on the subsequent spike.

"Nothing posted on this or any other bb can possibly have any affect on what a company is doing or its share price" - absolutely agree - what is posted on here has absolutely no affect on the share price.

AM has been here since 1 November 2019 - according to the share charts our share price on that day was 0.045p - we've seemingly made so much progress yet our share price is c30% lower.

The market needs reassurance from our BoD, urgently.

We might be getting ready for a proper assault on £1. Steady as she goes ;-) GLA

Teaye - I'm not saying that Diggerman's points need responding to per se by the BoD, but there are a number of things in there that could be construed as market sensitive under the FCA guidelines. If Diggerman's comments are indeed true and Edenville are withholding some of that information from the market, that's really not good.

The pressing bits are the Lind 30th November issue and the ongoing wading through treacle of the handover.

Our share price unfortunately reflects the market sentiment in us at the moment, and only a RNS will really change that. It's at times like this that the BoD can show their worth.

bigeye - your word is your bond. Ok. Remind me when you joined this board please?

Teaye - while I'm waiting for bigeye to come back and prove I'm a liar (!) I'll respond to the IFC Tim Metcalfe bit on this thread.
I emailed yesterday and have had nothing back, even an acknowledgement, as yet.
I will post if/when I do.

bigeye - and your proof please?

aerial - what is the point of that post?

bigeye - no - show me the post where I explicitly used the phrase "liar" in relation to anyone on this board, or any other boards I've posted on?
As the facts stand, the only person I remember using that word on here is you.

Bigeye - It's no play on words. I never called Aerial a liar, although I believe you have used that phrase to me in the past?

What's the difference then between accusing someone of lying and telling someone they are factually wrong? Or are you saying they are the same?

Bigeye - so answer my question then - yes or no
So accusing someone of lying is the same as telling someone they are factually wrong?

aerial - no, you were just wrong. Surely you agree we want factually correct information on the board?
It's not about arrogance - just reflecting on the, what was it, four posts in five or so minutes bashing my factual post on the climate.
Perhaps it's that sort of flippant and dismissive response to a factual post that is arrogant.

bigeye - "That is just a play on words"
Really?
So accusing someone of lying is the same as telling someone they are factually wrong?

aerial - of course. Learning is an integral part of being intelligent.

We all make mistakes, even you, but it's how we learn from them.

The name calling on here is quite obvious. It doesn't need me to point it out.

And so we get to the name calling.

aerial - it's not my opinion your facts were wrong. You were wrong.
I've posted the facts. You seem to have a problem accepting the facts.

It's very easy to refer to snippets of a post "people's opinions are irrelevant though" - if your on abut something I posted back in August this was to do with AM and a jam tomorrow thread and the fact that it's the market that needs convincing.

It's worth setting the context before quoting parts of posts.