Member Info for greentea1

point being is the mainstream'lazy' media, sieze upon reports like that and put it out there without any challenge or real analysis, its easy, lazy and they can take the rest of the day off.

Hi Suzy, yes thanks for the correction , I mean the net step in the environmental permit which requires stakeholder consultation, of which the existing eia is part and the permit isgranted by the land and environmental court.

Doesn’t have to be truthful or informed just spread propaganda, I see lies and falsehoods all the time on social media. Experts! What’s an expert? Just using the word and UN even though they don’t represent it is an attempt to legitimise the tripe written. They are certainly not experts in a mining application and I’m sure as it will be proven by an upcoming eia that there claims are sensatationalised and unfounded. However once it’s out there the feeble of mind lap it up. I take my hat of to them for their moves. Thor now it’s your hour.

Yet another international organization that has not been to Sweden and examined the case conditions, which does not understand that the environmental testing comes AFTER the concession decision, which does not comprehend where the reindeer are grazing and where the mine should be, which has not spoken with all stakeholders, have no task to weigh other national interests yet that is their focus, which ignores a billion in tax revenues or 500+ jobs in Jokkmokk.

With all due respect, but another international player who has no idea how Swedish legislation works and who unilaterally focuses on unreasonable fears. It is no wonder that it is getting a media impact, but legal or other merits have no criticism.

I’m can understand the fear and trepidation of FF23 but in this instance I tend to side with IBJJ, it will be a yes with a communique that the EIA is an important next step and will address some of the concerns expressed in the media.

Hi Geovanni, I dont think I ever stated that a decision would be made in the 2nd week of February?. I dont think any politician ahs suggested that it would, Bem being given a week to respond is in my mind a positive once more not a reason for a fall that I can attach to it.

yes, yes of course but as you yourslef have stated the drop in part from 17p to 15p was in part due to the soundings of the opposition, when there is a comprehensive rebuttal of some of the accusations and the sp falls, that doesnt seem reasonable. Anyhow its not worth debating, the sp will do what the sp does but sentiment isnt always based on rational considerations.

"The current price reflects the risk appetite of the market."

You can say that of a share price statement at any time, sentiment drove it to 17p, i dont think its unreasonable to have expected such a good rns not to push it back to that price point, risk is still on the table but some of the lies in the oppositions propaganda are exposed now, This was down almost 5% on that, is that reasonable probably not.

Weighing this down, no idea why

Excellent RNS stating what all us investors already new in a way that can’t be ignored by the detractors. That will drive the sp up. I salut bem and it’s management for burning the midnight oil this weekend that response is as good as you can provide and any reasonable neutral would see a compelling case for the mine whilst appreciating the cab had been biased and incompetent and a blocker to this process.

I meant point 4, omitted the number accidentally

Thanks Ibjj for your considered points, can you point me to some refereences/links re point as I've missed that news and I'd like to be reassured.

I'll be surprised if there isnt an RSN from BEM on Monday, re dialogue with goverment and maybe address someof the blatant lies in the media/sami report, should calm the nerves.

Thanks Bob, I manage dto convert the doc but it wont download on my imac, so I'd aprpreciate a summary when you have time.

Is obvioulsy no coincidence, lets hope BEM, announce dialogue with govt in the next few days. It would be comforting to see some collanboration, sitting tight.

Sven Otto Littorin, chairman of Beowulf Mining, has contacted the Archbishop and asked her for a meeting.
"Before you lent Your and the Swedish Church's authority to one side on a sensitive and conflict-filled issue, I had, both as chairman of Beowulf Mining and as a single member of the Swedish Church, wanted you to talk to us to get our b too fire over the issue and the future", writes Sven Otto Littorin to the Archbishop according to Real Time. He also states that the company can certainly break oak in a sustainable way for the environment.
The government has had Beowulf Minings application for processing concession on its table for five years. Minister of Nutrition Karl-Petter Thorwaldsson has stated that there will be a message after the first week of February

and the swedes get spooked too easily. I think it'll find support here and rise on some positive PR from Bem, needs something.

I’d like to be amazed, who’s joining the pro bem league?

As expected lots of negative propaganda, lies , protests, demonstrations and one eyed opinions from the Swedish media. I’d be disappointed however is after tomorrow we do not see engagement of the company. A press release of the positives , a rebuttal of some of the claims and dialogue with politicians. It’s a pivotal point now, winning the hearts and minds of the public is just as important as the law. Bem need to be proactive here, if for no other reason than the politicians aren’t doing a great job in that regard. Kurt this is your hour.

Very wise, bird in the hand etc and it'll be wine time too 8o)