Member Info for greentea1

Not sure what your point is, the share price is 12.5p, the ore is still in the ground. 50p will come but some say it was almost guaranteed overnight on a positive concension decision.

I thought we maybe hit 30p and retrace to low 20's from there, didnt expect it to hit these levels but i think most of the selling is done now. Swedish investors seem more like fickle gamblers than investors to me. Doesnt help when yu get rampers (1 notable owl) making claims of >50p baaed on thin air.

Totally agree Suzy, I won't read the guardian. Its reached the point where if your not far left your considered a nazi. Debate left society a long time ago, idiots pulling down statues, They should remain as a reminder of the past, if not to be celebrated.

@Kallack, I'm not giving you investment advice, I'm giving you my opinion, sell/buy, youre call. Its a pivotal moment for the company, I see sunny uplands from here , maybe I"m wrong we'll soon seen Kurts plan.

Any fool comparing this with SXX "well meaning" advice should be ignored. There is a high dollar value associated with the granting of the concension which will take time to be realise its full potential but looking back in a few years at this price, investors will have a smile on their faces.

When this was risk on, I’ll buy more if it goes down further.

..fantastic opportunity for those that havent awsted 9 years waiting, this should and will go much higher particularly if JV announced or even a sale, I mean the wulf is an explorer not a miner.

There is an even better story to sell which won’t take much research and they don’t even have to lie or make things up. It’s the disgraceful story of how Swedish beautocrscy has deliberately failed to deliver after 9 years. The sanctimonious swedes need to look at themselves their failed systems the utter one eyed *******s they spout and the complete hypocrisy of their liberal green ideology. It’s a simple story , if uncomfortable reading. If bem was lkab which was allowed to move an entire town, none of this crap would ever have happened. They govt, press and the doom goblin shoukd be embarrassed and exposed for the useless, inept thick as mince waste of spaces they are.

I’d never invest in Sweden again.

He said all along that it would be soon after the last submissions and when asked by a reported directly he hinted that March was a likley month, I'll try and find the report later.

Not recently but then he probably doesn’t look at the share price and navel gaze each day either, I’m just going on his comments prior to the recent submissions

Thir has intimated that a decision will be made this month. Assuming he’s good to his words then the good news could drop any day, so in essence we’ve never been closer to the outcome. I’m confident that a decision will be announced this month as why would Thor needlessly have backed himself into a corner, all his utterances this far have been positive and whilst there was a lots of negative press which whilst acknowledged he seem to be able to see through propaganda. I think the green push and dare I say it conflict in Ukraine are now key issues that will have positive considerations for the mine. We’ve come this far no point grumbling for the next 2 weeks. Of course if there is no decision in a months time, then thor will e proven to be ia disingenuous @@@@ and I’ll probably send him a poster of baylin for his bedroom wall. I having come this far to sell now.

Rickmeister.

I think tidal energy is challenging, hence why the lack of investment, solar and wind are far cheaper and less problematic

No need to be hystrical, little volume,maybe this is the buying opportunity.

Me, today green light after hours??

facile concession sweepstake:
I'll go 1st
Positve decsion Monday 21 after hours

In order to get the environment permit despite the fact there is an eia wont all the isssues that have been raised be addressed with all stakeholders as part of getting a permit agreed, I may well be Misunderstanding the process but isn’t that the bone to throw the Sami and where their arguments and demands for compensation will be negotiated.

Hi Wots, I got it off one of the fb Beowulf pages, whether any of the lazy hacks in Sweden could be bothered to report on something that exposes their ineptitude I don’t know, maybe one of our Swedish friends may comment. It’s been a common theme over there from what I can see, facts and the law don’t matter if it gets in the way of a good story not dissimilar to the media here.

The government received a letter from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, which was raised quite large in the media. Large black headlines under the theme "UN experts call on Sweden's government: "Say no to the Kallak mine"".

Well, it's not really like that. The two "experts" are so s k Special Reporturs, i.e. unpaid people who are not employed by the UN or the High Commissioner but who are appointed to move different areas on a voluntary basis.

The two, who are oddly not mentioned in the article, are David R Boyd, a Canadian eco activist who, among other things, has been the CEO of an organization called Ecojustice, and Carl Tzay, a human rights activist from Guatemala.

As far as I know, none of them have visited Sweden. None of them seem to know that the environmental testing happens after a concession is granted. None of them has any special insight into how cleaning is done, where the mine is supposed to be, how the clean-up leaders are supposed to be pulled. None of them have spoken to us or anyone who can give them a different perspective on the issue than the one they have brought to life by those who are against the mine. None of them can Swedish legislation, none of them takes any responsibility for investments, jobs and development in Jokkmokk.

It should also be said that the system of reporters itself has received a lot of criticism. The fact that they are not paid by the UN system has raised suspicions about **** and other things, because no one knows how their operations are financed.

The European Centre for Law and Justice just last year did a stinging recount on such reporters because it cannot be excluded that companies, or for that matter activist groups, can buy themselves into conclusions and criticism as then delivered under the flag of the UN system.

Therefore, the letter of these reporters has no legal effect on a Swedish administrative case. But is rather an illustrative example of how opinion education and impact campaigns can be designed.

Without wishing to get into a discussion of brexit, I will point out that it was an entirely negative campaign on the part of stay based on project fear. Most of which forecasts of imminent doom never happened and that was put out there by so called experts.