Member Info for Greenmachine67

Fingers, good point that hadn't occured to me. It seems that scalability and the speed thereof is key

Lawrence I'm not doubting the figures, all I was trying to do was point to the different circumstances at the time of the 80p days or different government and "in place " mou.
Looking at the overall picture things are looking evermore rosy by the week

Sorry mrcautious, meant to reply in my last post. The 80p so was when we held 100% of cinovec and I'm sure you're aware that we now hold 49%.

Was mulling over the future direction of emh last night. Will we continue to get everything off the ground and produce well into the future or will our 49% be bought out either CEZ or some other?
A couple of things stand out as we progress, one being the fact that we are on a number of exchanges which I think is a positive. With aim being aim it is possible that the sp is played with up and down price movements that sometimes defy logic. With the other exchanges this should provide some sort of insurance against this. The other important feature is a relative lack of liquidity in this share which in turn deters the daytraders, again a positive.

Ngms you appear to slipped your operation into overdrive with your postings here and advfn and also sharing graphs from lemonfool. No matter what you say I still find it strange that someone who has no axe to grind (sic) finds the time and inclination to continually post regurgitated data that has been gone over a million times. Weird behaviour if you ask me.
Oh, i nearly forgot. You mentioned a few days ago that you wouldn't be posting again until after the September update. Looks like the other guys on backshift never got the memo.

Ok fingers, I'll take your word for it.

Fingers you're still not getting it are you? Our current mcap is approx £30 million and 150 million odd shares in existence. As we progress it does not take much for the shareholding total to rise considerably. Be it either options or payment in lieu or equity it matters not.

Antelope, the 2024 figure was the year I am expecting production to start in earnest and hence start the wonga stream. If I've got this date wrong I apologise...

European Metals Holdings Limited (ASX & AIM: EMH, FSE: E861.F) ("European Metals" or "the Company") advises that it has today issued 3,000,000 new Ordinary Shares (represented by Depository Interests or "DIs") in the Company in respect of an exercise of options at AU$0.166 per DI ("DIs Shares"). The proceeds of AU$498,000 will be used for general working capital.

From yesterday's rns. The last sentence makes me think that in order to pay the bills until first lithium then the only way to achieve this is by equity raise. It appears we are not on a free run until 2024/5

Fingers, no I don't and neither do you. That is the point I'm making.

Wilco, that was my point last week re equity. As I said then, I will be delighted when this comes to fruition but they still need to pay the bills......cue me getting called a keyboard warrior/stupid lol

Sorry rns

Ngms, you have appeared again on this BB and responded to a number of posts and questions, at times at great length. Every post has a negative connotation or if we are lucky there is a small twinkling positive snippet in there. I'm sorry but you've given me a belly laugh with your latest about anything outside an end is conjecture. Are you serious?....... All you've done for evermore is apply a negative slant on all YOUR conjecture. NGMS and irony.....oh my sides.

Pitiful glee in the tone suggests some kind of psychological misalignment at the purported misfortune of others. It says more about him than anyone else. I for one hope you all make a shedload here....

Ngms, like me you are an ex-hur shareholder. Why you feel you need to post here with your thoughts is beyond me. I also note your apparent lack of the IMO nomenclature telling.

Ok fingers, if it's so stupid will you be willing to indemnify my shareholding against any future dilution?

Jeez, it seems that there are a few sensitive souls on here. Ok, let's put this to bed. My original post was something that I have experienced before in very similar circumstances. As the business progressed there was a considerable increase in equity. That's all I was saying. It looks likely that this will not be the case here but nothing is certain in this game.....

Lawrence, draw a line under your combative nature. I'm not stooping to your level of animosity and only here to learn more about emh.

Lawrence, that's funny.

Thanks Antelope, I was aware of the proposed funding path but was trying to add a little devil's advocacy into the mix. If they pull this off I'll be absolutely delighted.