RE: Copper surge25 Sep 2025 11:40
Shuvlin, instead of an easy put down, I wonder if reason might prevail....? This was @chatmandu's response to the announcement of the proposed buyer of the SA business, on 12/08/2025 08:13, just 73 minutes after the circular was published. I could have chosen any of numerous comments over time but this is a good illustration:
"Who are One Chrome? Are they the same company as Chrome One?
If so, why does the circular, with a legal requirement to be accurate, contain such a stupid error? Total incompetence?
If not:
Who are One Chrome?
When was One Chrome formed?
Are One Chrome a private or public company?
If Private, who owns One Chrome?
If Public, where are they listed?
Why have they chosen a name so similar to Chrome One?
Is the choice of name a deliberate attempt to spread confusion?"
So because he couldn't find the answer immediately himself, the accusations fly ...."why does the circular, with a legal requirement to be accurate, contain such a stupid error? Total incompetence?"..... Another person, on not finding the information, would simply post asking if anyone else had. But to date that's not chatty's MO ... its all guns blazing based on unfounded assumptions. I wonder, can he see why posting wild accusations based on nothing other than his lack of knowledge gets people's backs up and leads to invective being directed at him? Will this example make any difference in future or is it a case of leopards and spots? Only time will tell....