RE: Pros, Cons, Unknowns11 Feb 2019 21:15
I had a quick scan of the document again and didn't see the part where it said about hope being limited to the $2million interest? can you give me a heads up to where it is? Something like this takes a about 5 reads to sink in properly (for me)
I'm no legal eagle but if evidence found in the discovery was mentioned or used in this ruling would it not be mentioned as the source of a particular bit of information eg like emails or the affidavits mentioned. (assuming any of it was used)
I also wonder if point 38 which is highlighted by the judge as the 'highpoint' of FRR's evidential claims will have any potential leverage in the OOC as the judge says it could support an entirely separate legal case in itself if proved sufficiently