The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
I posted last night re being "Reassured" - I am glad the RNS came out exactly as expected & scheduled.
One other point I forgot to highlight is the seemingly pointed fingers at The Validation Group (TVG) in the Twigger refute. So, this could be the save face / way out for the settlement.....I.E. not the govt fault, TVG did not clean the data up as well as they should have. Of course, I imagine it was the govt who commissioned TVG and hold final responsibility for how it used and what caveats are in TVG's reports......but it is certainly a way out.
We march forward with confidence, IMHO.
I have always been curious what the basis of the DHSC claim is and legal case thereof. Today's Sky News reporting helped clarify quite a lot for me.
Firstly, by my interpretation of the article, the summary judgement has been dismissed and we are going to full hearing in the High Court in June. This from the last sentence "The hearing is set to continue at the High Court." I expect an RNS to that effect at 7am.
Secondly, subject to above interpretation being right, it would appear that the DHSC felt their claim was so clearly justified by what they deemed as lack of robustness (ie test failures) resulting in breach of contract, they asked for a summary judgement. This has been refuted by Twigger/Novacyt on the basis the data that supports that assertion has been wrongly analysed. For many reasons, tests can fail and not necessarily due to product defects / inadequacies. I think someone mentioned as a professional in this space, and I am aware of this too, if a test is not properly administered, there are "contamination", process incorrect etc, such test failures (or success) should be excluded. For the court to agree means there is more than enough in the data that supports the refute.
This is obviously only one part, but a big part of the DHSC claim ie the product "does not do what it says on the tin", otherwise they would not call this argument out for the summary judgement and the whole claim value. For it to be dismissed is very reassuring to me.
I am more convinced than before a settlement will be reached before full court hearing date. The only reason it will now go the distance is because Novacyt wants the full amount and the (positive) publicity that comes with it. From my perspective, it will be better both parties settle, in a "face-saving" manner and draw a line against it. Perhaps accompanied by a new deal with DHSC for other products in our portfolio.
Good luck all.
Court hearing is at 9.30am per the Caseboard, so we should hear during the day......GLA.
https://caseboard.io/cases/f3fa868e-723e-443d-8d5a-991769a05892
No, you haven't. You're broadly right. It is growth PA, so compounded is how I read it over 3 years.
I set out my expectation depending on outcome of DHSC dispute - all point to above £1 and some even more. BUT like I said, that's a moment in time and in the next few months we will know. The task of the Board is to keep it there and grow it! If they do, then fair play - take the award!
PI100, what you are saying makes no sense at all!
(a) This is a 3-year LTIP scheme - so, it is as much a retention tool as it is a reward scheme. It only vest at the end of measurement period ie 31 December 2026;
(b) The management team now have an incentive to deliver TSR of 30%+ PA over the next three years to trigger the 100% award......it is meant to be achievable whilst giving SH a decent return too.....
(c) Any talk they just get a nice bonus / bump post DHSC dispute (subject to outcome) is not right. Even with the bump, they have to keep it there and for the next 2.5 years!;
(d) They now have every incentive to drive SP higher than £1.38......I was concerned the new directors have little / no shareholding and with the closed period / sensitive time now, unable to buy even if they wanted to. So, I really like the fact they have this now;
(e) As people pointed out, it's not that many shares in total - enough as an incentive, not too big to cause a fuss re massive dilution.
All in all, pleased this has been done. Another piece of the jigsaw in a proper functioning growth oriented company. Over to you Lyn & co to deliver this time!
I think I mentioned before, one of the first things Lyn Rees did when he took over as CEO in Yourgene was to negotiate settlement of legal dispute between then Premaitha and Illumina.......removing "hand cuffs" as he called it. He also negotiated the restructure of Thermofisher loan with a significant write off / waiver from them.
For all his "sins", Lyn did get value of Yourgene to £100m+ before its ultimate fall post Covid......so, I am encouraged by recent appointment. And yes, I lost a tonne in Yourgene, but still support the appointment!
This action is much more than ISA new year.....
I suspect it could be:
- DHSC settlement;
- Significant commercial contract (perhaps from the Chinese);
-PLUS About time it recovered from an unnatural low.
All the best.
Hi Kaeren, good find. I don't know. The facility I was referring to and aware of is Port Coquitlam. This looks like another site. I can only surmise (guessing only), it could be a large enough customer who has adopted Ranger and Yourgene is supporting their in-house but outsourced implementation.........
Hi Kaeren, as far as I know, Yourgene Canada set up a best in class lab and factory in Canada. It was in fact launched with the mayor "cutting the ribbon". I remember it was expanding the scale in preparation for the increased adoption, particularly in the consumables (testing cassettes). I don't know if that capability has been emulated in other key markets, don't think so nor think it is needed.
In some of the other settlement deals, the DHSC shared in the IP of the Covid related tests / tools, given they paid bulk of its development / commercialisation. All I am suggesting is that for a win-win ie no one loses face, there could be a deal done whereby DHSC settles all outstanding invoices (no extra), but they also sign a preferential rate deal for all of Novacyt's tests or share of income, related to infectious disease.......just a thought. That's a win-win.
Doesn't Novacyt have portfolio of tests for insect borne diseases?
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/other/mosquito-warning-for-british-holidaymakers-as-imported-infections-return-to-pre-pandemic-levels/ar-BB1kvRQr?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LGTS&cvid=ceec1ae6717f4abd8bdbd175b34b7044&ei=14
Perhaps a deal can be done with DHSC.....?
BBC News - Lung cancer: Liquid biopsies could speed up treatment
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-65377533
BBC News - Blood test reveals best lung cancer treatment
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68624334
Reading two articles from BBC News, one from 2023 and now today, good to see liquid biopsies helping patients. I recall that Ranger Technology can further enhance this.........
Davand, we were on the same journey! I don't deny what I have written/said but like many, I can only go with what I read, have been told and can see, based on what's out there. Quite frankly, I also didn't expect such incompetence in terms of cash management! Topline actually wasn't far off, it was the financial stewardship that failed us - we all know what happened to the then CFO. From a more hopeful perspective, we have an interim CEO and the CFO in Novacyt, both of whom by the sound of this Board manages finances tightly. So, with Lyn's enthusiasm and growth agenda, may realise the potential we know is there in a disciplined manner.
Having said all that, what's holding this SP is the legal dispute. That will be clarified soon!
Sorry for the religious connotation.
Under 3 months to court hearing.
Will we see a negotiated settlement prior.........tick, tock, tick, tock.....
Can't see either party rolling the dice then so still expect RNS anytime stipulating:
"Novacyt pleased to announced a settlement to the DHSC dispute.........uncertainty resolved - we move forward with confidence. Core business growing etc."
I have laid out the scenarios before - all probable ones lead to a much higher SP.
Let's go!
Hi All, it's disappointing to observe the SP performance. The only comfort is that looking at the charts, SP drifts lower on low volume, but rises on heavy volume. We wait for corporate development news and of course, the DHSC dispute settlement. Whilst we wait, I thought it more informative to discuss life post DHSC dispute resolution under various scenarios:
Scenario 1: Goes to court, Novacyt wins > under this scenario, I fully expect Novacyt to return cash to shareholders (versus buyback). This is because shares in issue only 70m so not big, and shareholders deserve it! A one-off dividend of 50p will be the minimum I expect in this scenario, leaving plenty of cash in the business to deliver a profitable business.
Scenario 2: Settlement in favour of Novacyt, but not full amount. Depending on settlement amount, I also expect a one-off distribution.
Scenario 3: Settlement at NIL liability both sides. This will still mean a circa £8m VAT reclaim, improving the cash position of the company. With the clarity, I still expect a small distribution, perhaps 10p, with the remaining cash used to deliver the growth needed to become profitable.
Scenario 4: Settlement in favour of DHSC. Novacyt will not settle at any values that will compromise its going concern. So, I imagine it will be max £8-10m, countered by the VAT reclaim. Even so, it will pave the way to a clearer future.
Scenario 5: Goes to court and Novacyt loses. Subject to appeal, game over.
Whilst a possibility, scenario 5 is the least likely. No good for any parties, and for the remaining cash, to put 250 employees out of a job is not something the Court will take lightly. Perhaps even in this scenario, there might be a negotiated lifeline.
The more likely scenarios are 1 - 4, and in my view, any of these will move our SP north of £1.
Not surprised with the potential takeover price!
Going by Iliad's offer, which was rejected, the sum of parts of Vodafone is at least double the equity value today, after stripping out net debt.
Petty cash to the Magnificent 5.
Microsoft will be interesting.......they already are investing in the IOT business which will be a standalone from 1 April - surprised we have not heard more on that.
I would have given TW post more credence if it didn't say ".......in a best case scenario, take the same trip early next year when it runs out of cash.". From that alone, he is clearly scaremongering. At worst, cash burn is £10m, and at best, reduced to £6m. So, with £44m in the bank, I think the company will be fine. And if they deliver growth, can get to cash flow breakeven end next year, all things being equal.
This SP fall is an opportunity for those who believe the litigation will be settled / closed at NIL or above. I do.
I thought it useful to share the details around the Taiwan divestment. I believe today's news is nothing to do with the company, but rather the change in management at INEX.
It's a shame re perception in this BB - in reality, it is not material from a cash consideration perspective (see below), and we still have the lab and options around it.
Key terms of the Divestment include:
-- Upfront payment: US$1m payable on the Closing Date; plus
-- Loan agreement: US$1m payable as a lump sum or via ad hoc instalments within two years of the Closing Date (carrying interest at 7 per cent. above the Bank of England base rate) ("Loan Agreement"); plus
-- Earn-out consideration : up to US$2m potential earnout subject to the achievement of certain profit related milestones, over the next two calendar years post completion.
-- The Loan Agreement is secured against the shares of the subsidiary being sold such that failure to pay will result in ownership returning to Yourgene with no obligation to return previously received funds.
The divestment was meant streamline the Group's operations, enabling Yourgene to focus its strategic efforts on expanding the core Asia-Pacific product-based activities whilst retaining a strong route to market in Taiwan and reduce the Group's ongoing expenditure by approximately GBP 0.5m on an annualised basis. For the year ended 31 March 2023, on a post-restructure pro forma basis, Yourgene Health Taiwan had turnover of circa GBP2.0m and was profit breakeven.
Hope this clarifies.
I note that there is £8.2m of VAT receivable that was paid over to HMRC on invoices billed to DHSC not yet received, and part of the dispute. So, even in the case where DHSC and Novacyt settles at NIL liability on both sides, there will be £8.2m coming back into the company.