Member Info for GGPThruandtru

I’d double check that PJ. I use ii and it’s fine. A quick google search of Hargreaves ISA and ASX shares says they’re allowed there too.

Can’t see us delisting from AIM myself, as companies grow they usually want to be on more exchanges, not less. Remember, we’re close to becoming a fully fledged multi asset major miner. If you look at the other biggies they’re listed on multiple exchanges. I can see being added to exchanges, not delisting them.

US, Frankfurt, Canada etc. Why on earth would a company shrink investor access as the company grows?

Bringing me up again Nap?

Like is said…Rent free, rent free 😏 Nice of you to think of me again. Hope you manage to get some sleep tonight though. Can’t be good for you staying awake cursing the “Thunder?” all night! 🙈

I even have a crew now 💪 I’m gonna make a five a side team…or is my crew big enough for an eleven a side team?

26koz production a year for $15m capex was the main point I got. That is fantastic in any metric! Patience will be needed but we’ll get there. OMI doesn’t need ramping…the company speaks for itself.

The funny thing is I used to defend you against Tymers on the GGP board Nap. Turns out he might have been right.

Sleep well…😎

Awww…nice of you to think of me Nap…but if I’m gonna live rent free in your head, at least get the name right. You’ll sleep better that way when cursing me in your sleep.

Do you see how Dr. R. uses facts, figures, examples and info to put a case across in a logical way for everyone to see? That’s how you help people.

Stick to drawing your rockets, sparkles and red dots and let the adults do the real research.

Great post Dr. Remington 👍

But the shares bought today on LSE would take at least a working day to move, usually two…and more even sometimes depending on the process used, so the arbitrage is lost.

Hang on a second…either I’m confused or this theory holds no water. If they’re doing it to get shares over to the ASX then surely it needs to be the other way around?

Now, with LSE lower you’d buy here and sell the shares you have on the ASX. That way you make the small arbitrage gain…so more buying in your LSE pot (more shares) and more selling in your ASX pot? (less shares)

No?

Or they wanting everyone to transfer all their shares over to the ASX through the broker before you sell?? I mean anyone playing the arbitrage properly would have two pots, hence the conundrum above.

???

Congrats 👍

Haha you’re hilarious Nap. That’s your go to answer to everyone that challenges you. Guaranteed I’ve been in OMI longer than you even knew it existed.

You carry on ramping everything dude. It’ll come back and bite you eventually and the people you drag down with you. How’d it go at FDR? You were ramping that as a certainty too 😂

Correction: Dr.R’s comments on Brad.

I had no point 4003. My gripe is with serial rampers calling out people for having genuine points. OMI is looking super and work progressing really well, but there are always negatives and they shouldn’t be dismissed so easily.

It helps if everything is looked at as a whole. OMI has huge potential and with Legal’s info about Brad, it means we should be in good experienced hands. Can only see this going upwards for now 😎

Over what? Holes 61,62 and 63? They’re nothing Nap.

The two main heading ones are very good 👍 but they are infill. They won’t move the share price like you think Nap.

Hey Legal, yeah it’s a possibility. I mean there’s no actual rules to the spacing for inferred and sometimes even the measured/indicated can be done using wider gaps, but the confidence in those numbers would be lower. Rule of thumb, the tighter the spacing, the more confident the numbers. An MRE is exactly what it says ‘an estimate’. The type of deposit varies these requirements too.

Usually the PFS (pre-feasibility study) and the actual FS are the ones that really matter and are used for the actual production numbers. They require a hell of a lot more drilling.

Caveat is the depth. As this is really really shallow stuff, are they able to bypass a lot of the bureaucracy and just dig the stuff out? 😂🤷‍♂️

Great post Red0rb.

Covers all directions and guesses using data at hand. Without going back through all the RNS’s hard to decipher the angles from today’s RNS.

With all your ramping Nap, you clearly don’t look at the RNS’s that much. The northern side hits of 61,62,63 are weak in comparison. Doesn’t mean someone is a de-ramper and it doesn’t mean that there isn’t more deeper. But we are open in other directions so plenty of scope for them to work with.

An MRE (depending on which compliance rules they’re working to) requires very close spacing drills. A lot of these drills on the outskirts won’t be included in the initial one but should come into play when it’s updated each time. Drill Spacing usually needs to be 5-10m apart for it to be comprehensive enough to be included in an MRE.

Lots to look forward to here and plenty of cash available for further works 💪

Give it a rest with the rampers and derampers Nap. It gets boring. If you look at Mosa’s past posting, it doesn’t feel like a deramp.

It was the word ‘system’ that throws it off. Grades might be trailing off in the northern direction from 61,62,63 but it all depends on which direction they’re drilling. The whole ‘system’ is still open in multiple directions by the look, but maybe the northern side is weakening out. 64 extends it to the West though using the same thinking. Time will tell.

What makes you say that Mosa? Hole 64 was one of the better ones.

Infill drilling never really moves the share price unless it’s something crazy good. It just adds more security and info for the eventual MRE.

Nice find 👌 Been a long time since we had some good coverage like that…let’s hope it gets the wheels rolling…the Zinc value here is crazy compared to our Mcap. Surely the two need to slowly start aligning at some point 💪

The only thing i know about Skarn is that it’s apparently “Nature’s Treaure Chest” 😂

Nothing special. Just terms and conditions required by law. You’ll find the same wording on loads of RNS’s.

There is only one thing I recommend to newbies in the stock market (as most things are subjective to the individual) and that is…

…to pick a topic/subject/sector you’re ACTUALLY interested in or want to be interested in and stick to those types of companies. It allows you to learn quicker and become more adept at spotting the good things from the bad things. Over time you’ll learn how that topic/subject works and even enjoy the markets as opposed to chasing numbers.

Most people dive into any company they can covering everything and anything. I stick to gold/copper. I know a little about other metals (silver/zinc/tungsten etc) through the companies i have invested in, but I know nothing about oil/pharma/technology and most other stuff when it comes to stock market valuations. So I stay clear and I sleep easier.

Every topic/subject/sector has listed companies available. You could literally follow anything but volatility and risk are linked to the sectors themselves so some are crazier than others. Metals is very very crazy in comparison to other sectors.

Food/Drink/Gaming/Books/Sports/Retail…whatever…you get the point. There are shares for everything. Pick one you enjoy or pick one you want to enjoy cos of the ups and downs. (Metals) But pick one, stick to it and learn through it.

Yeah. I think that’s where the (transition category) comes in Ricky.

They have even declared to the market but they might not be all exercised. But that transition amount is probably the total of warrants set to expire this month.

They might get executed they might not. Sometimes they’re even held by people that are no longer interested in the company, or ex staff that won’t bother or even people that have left our realm 🤷‍♂️

I’m guessing we’ll find out the total exercised on the expiry date if not mentioned anywhere before.