RE: News10 Nov 2018 18:18
Jez,
I think you’ll find any holding I may have in MYSQ is currently valued at the same as your investment. For the avoidance of doubt, that means 0p, either way.
Your “recommendations”, so-called advice and guidance clearly count for naught; this company has been uninvestable from origination and if you truly read all the RNS releases as well as the historical accounts in particular and did a teensy bit of actual research on both the company and Management prior to investing you, as the so-called “savvy investor” you proclaim yourself to be, could, would and should have realised this.
Happy to take a sportsman’s/charity bet that this company will never be sold as any basic due diligence would uncover the legacy issues whether that be the company needing related party (controlled by Schaer) work to survive / post abnormal revenue figures or the true actual number of users rather than the current, much-diminished “best estimate”. It’s all been one big pump for the last 18-24 months including the Beaufort supposed 21p target price or the supposed rumour about Tencent having any sort of interest in the company. As happens all too often on AIM, the spoof clearly worked on some, including you. More than once.
I don’t particularly have the time it may take to point out the myriad reasons I have recently chosen to respond to you in particular; suffice to say, anyone who has had even half an eye on this board since mid 2017 has seen the manner in which you operate. Whether that be the clear lack of actual research you seem to have done prior to investing last year on the back of a Facebook tip, the repetitive bullishness and unwillingness to even listen to any sort of alternative view preferring to ramp the heck out of this stock (remember hyperbagger?) to the cringeworthy, hypocritical manner in which you post negative comments when not invested in stocks, including MYSQ, all-the-while castigating anyone who defends their position as “man-guarding”. Swiftly followed by the volte-face when you decide to invest again because the stock has hit your finger-in-the-air target price despite the fundamentals being exactly the same. If you can’t take it, and I haven’t as easily resorted to personal barbs as you have, then you shouldn’t dish it out.
You can carp on and on about Schaer and how you had his number all along when, in actual fact, you clearly didn’t and your change of view only seemed to occur when you realised on the morning of the LSE investor event that the quoted revenue figures were in fact not at all #simplyamazing. Yet still you fail to see the sheer naivety you display in investing back into MYSQ despite Eric still being in control when you did so; one of the obvious points of research and reasons to invest is Management and to decide to re-invest and start ramping again simply evidences your investing inexperience ergo your “smashed portfolio” QED.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
