Member Info for GF123

Ruck

What’s the point of ABs post and yours.

Fact is the company didn’t sell. And I’d wager when it does it will sell for a dam sight more than it would have ten years ago.

Just hope you and AB haven’t sold out completely on the rise. Ouch!

ATB

That suggests our buyer is still there taking shares where they can but maybe the previous line of shares have now gone? And mms are having to work really hard to fill orders? Either way it’s obvious PIs trading now are very likely to regret it. For those ‘astute’ enough to have been building their own stake, holding them and not trading they might just get their rewards in due course. Let’s see. Roll on news. ATB

It’s like taking sweeties off babies. ATB

Roses. Any thoughts on current trades today?

There are some very odd trades going through. Down at the moment after a 18.1p trade for almost the same value as large 19.4 trade. Got my own ideas of what's happening but surely we will see some movement shortly? ATB

Roses. Very odd day. What do you think happened today if L2 is looking so good. No big buy unlike last few days. ATB

20p tomorrow?

Another good day for LTHs. Not so much for the ‘astute’.

This movement doesn’t feel like a normal Sclp rise. As of course many have said.

Im just waiting for a snippet of news. Could be very very good for some.

It’s all about how many you hold.

ATB

Ivy. No point replying in any detail. Literally nothing of any relevance to respond to. Ivy send in someone else to bat. You are simply just not up to it. Ivy Tripped over the rope whilst coming to the crease. Retired hurt. ATB

Ivy

Read your own post. You have just proved my point to everyone very succinctly.

It’s about time maybe you followed Simon. And move on. Not sure you can add very much more anyway.

And zilch in 9 years. I’ve posted my average several time. 11.6 currently. Do the maths Ivy. I can assure you it’s not zilch for me. But what if I t was? I’ve also stated several times Sclp was always a long term hold investment for me. I know you can’t comprehend that but it’s fact.

Anyway. Sill need something for the dog. Do you know a salesman that can help?

ATB

Ivy

Did you get help drafting that reply?

Anyway put simply your reply is still all over the place.

How do you know I only invest in one share? I'm afraid you are again mistaken.

And who am I relying on to invest in SCLP. You make, again a wrong assumption, that it maybe someone on another BB. Wrong again.

Fact is I have invested what I have in sclp and despite several years of people like you trying to discredit me, and again in your last post, you and others actually know nothing.

And yes people, some even with monies to invest, do often post on BBs mainly to highlight the rubbish spouted by some. And boy has there been some rubbish posted on here.

So thanks' for the reply Ivy. But I am afraid it would be more helpful if you didn't put words in my mouth (something I've seen as a very clear tactic over the years) and actually came up with some useful comments of your own. If of course you actually have any.

ATB

Ruck

Ok. Ill explain simply.

I know Ivy isn't the sharpest tool in the box but lets use his last post to clarify:-

"As Ruck says we all want the SP to go up and it is great to see the rise here and to be successful for patients and SH but as there seems clear institutional demand and my view is there will be a price limit they will be prepared to pay hence if they want to buy a big stake then LD will take any opportunity to secure long term funding ( also makes strengthens SCLP hand in any discussion with potential partners )."

So Ivy acknowledges that there is institutional demand.

We can all see that unusual buying is taking place. (Note this level of buying in SCLP is most unusual. I've not seen it before).

Then he decides there is a cap on the price they are prepared to pay? How? He cant possible know that unless he knows who is buying, why they are buying and how much they intend to buy? Would he care to clarify?

Then he randomly suggests that Lindy may do a raise to facilitate them buying a larger stake. Do the other investors even want that? After all two of them are now on the board.

So why are someone buying in here in the first place? Would they seriously buy many % in the market to raise the share price so that Lindy can then offer more shares? Especially not even knowing if the other investors/SH would want them too? Remember what happened last time when Redmile tried to invest? Vulpes turned it down and had to be out voted by existing share holders. I know this because I was contacted to ask if I would vote to support the board to get the Redmile deal through. BTW that isn't happening this time with the level Redmile hold!

I'm afraid this is just hog wash from someone without a scooby. As Bob just stated. But is keen to spread miss-information, whilst of course being a shareholder.

So yes Ruck & Ivy and you are trying to spout rubbish on this and other BBs. IMO.

So in terms of being experts. My dog has a dry nose. Can Ivy sell me something to help?

ATB

Not seen.

Bob.

Well said.

Ivy and Ruck interfere and claim to be experts. Ask yourself why would you hold shares and then post on a BB a so called "balanced" view, whilst of course not actually being balanced at all.

Meanwhile, the market ignores them and SP continues to rise. Why?

Fact is something different is happening with SCLP right now. We have never seen this type of continuous buying before.

Lets see what happens. Like I've said what if we also get news?

ATB

Should see north of 19p today. All without news. With news? ATB

Ruck.

So what is your question that proves the statement wrong?

If there is no question. What is yours?

ATB

Buys going through everyday.

Science says there is no question that cancer vaccines work. I.e no risk.

Ivy, Ruck and the ‘Astute’ only see risk. Nothing more and are still desperate to hang onto that mantra.

Meanwhile people buy, the SP rises and LTHs, who didn’t listen to the ‘astute’, smile as their portfolios increase in £’s.

Question is…. Will the “astute” still see risk when we see the end game?

Let the mantra of no risk hang in the air. Until the ‘astute’ realise, for balance, they may have got it wrong.

ATB

Ruck.

As stated Sardesai appears to agree with Inanaco.

For balance, if you don’t mind, I’ll go with Sardesai rather than you in suggesting his statement is hilarious.

He, and by inference to Inanaco’s position, seems very clear.

“It is no longer a question of whether cancer vaccines work.”

He appears to see no risk.

ATB

Ruck

So my comments below are hilarious? Is that because I don’t agree with you?

3.3m shares just in my ISA alone plus what I hold in trading account and SIPP. Now that is hilarious.

If I hadn’t followed a buy and hold strategy over many years, as you have advocated for years, I could never have achieved that in my ISA!

You stick to what you do Ruck. And I’ll stick to what I do.

Fact is people in the industry understand what Sclp are doing.

You don’t.

As clearly taking the higher ground, especially when Sclp shares have gone up 100% recently, makes you, and your band of merry men, look even sillier.

Enjoy the rise Ruck. Like the rest of us.

ATB

Great to see Scancell Ltd featured in an article by Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News discussing the evolution and resurgence of cancer vaccines. Our CEO Lindy Durrant spoke with Tiffany Yesavage, PhD to the benefits of Scancell’s novel ‘off-the-shelf’ cancer vaccine approach.

The future of cancer vaccines

“We are in a remarkable time,” Sardesai concludes. “It is no longer a question of whether cancer vaccines work. I am really looking forward to the next 12 to 24 months when we will see more data come out and truly validate the developments of the past few years.”

Looks like someone within scancell agrees with inanaco. No risk now.

ATB

Should be another good day tomorrow! ATB