Interesting banter31 Jul 2021 13:48
I’m finding the friction here interesting.
For example I picked Berm up earlier in the week for stating as a fact the CH’s departure had been handled badly. And I suggested he should have at least said IMO much as he does himself with other posters.
Then in jump ivy and ruck to say I didn’t know what I was talking about.
My point was simple. We as share holders do not know the reason for ch departure and just because SCLP announced at 5pm he is leaving with immediate effect I still maintain you can’t say it’s been handled badly as fact.
Then after reading over on FM bonkers (a bb I would avoid posting on but find it assuming as it full of utter rubbish) by the same three posters that I was first stressed (berm), put right in my clearly incorrect comments (ruck even though he did nothing of the sorts) and then berm later stated that ch departure was probably managed ok given the circumstances! (What circumstances berm? You never stated).
Well here we are having had ch leave, Lindy in top job, covid trial announcement and a vulpes buy and now over 3.5p higher.
So was the CH departure well managed as I clearly suggested it may actually be? I suggest the market has reacted well to the news now of Lindy in top job and with potentially more to come. Let’s see.
My point here is that hasiba has clearly invested here more heavily than some. And maybe, just maybe, that frustrates some? After all I’ve been hounded by some of the same posters because it’s been claimed am C7, I’m inanaco, I don’t exist, I don’t actually hold the number of shares I’ve claimed or indeed any shares at all.
The point I’m making is that views should be allowed and discussed and there is a tendency for some (you know who you are) to consistently claim you are always correct, especially after the event, even though an agenda and theme runs through your posts over many years (I should know I’ve been here my self long enough) which mirrors IMO other bb posters consistently. I’ll leave that up to the readers to assume why!
Anyway the point now is that if you hold any reasonable level of shares in Sclp you probably have an average lower than current sp (whether you brought and hold or traded some) and we have all probably called it about right, irrespective of what other posters suggest, as it’s clear Sclp is in its next chapter.
And those invested now, irrespective of the number you could afford to now hold, are very very possibly going to get a nice return. (Subject to trials being done / proven before anyone picks me up).
So in summary let’s try and play nicely boys and girls. As I am personally very happy with my investment decisions here. And no berm I’m not stressed I’m actually very unstressed but thank you for your concerns.
ATB
Sign In
Follow the stocks
