Member Info for get_rich_quick

Cashking, I don't believe you're thinking carefully about what you've said. Medical insurance companies? I presume you mean private medical insurance. Are you referring to BUPA / SPIRE / NUFFIELD? If so, they already have their own health coaching staff and home suppor services by area nurses and computerised equipment to measure their ailments. I fail to see what more we can offer. I also fail to see why a patient / or the private care facility would pay an additional cost to use us just for health coaching, when the private health care facility utilises specialised equipment that we won't have access / reading devices for. Large employers? Do you know how debilitating severe COPD is for a person? Do you think many of those with that ailment are currently working their usual 9x5 jobs? Even with the fortunate few who aren't restricted with every day mobility, do you think it's those who are struggling to cope with every day activities? I think you and TLY should go back the drawing board........again. Spike, If you also contacted (or spoke) to Wendy regards company transparency then I take my 10-gallon hat off to you too. ATB.

Congratulations, Knigelk that was another fine, benign post that offers little or no constructive balance to my post. And of note: I've been in Bruges for a long weekend. I hope that satisfies your silliness.

I really don't know whether to laugh or cry. I also see no other person has had a well thought out objective opinion regards the recent Rns, which speaks volumes, just as the Rns does. Let's start on a positive. The transparency with current and past contracts is excellent. I almost feel the Bod has taken on board some of my comments that I inundated them with. Nonetheless, it provides an excellent snapshot with contract timescales, and more importantly, it highlights the lengthy amount of time it takes for a contract to begin. Financially, we're a tad worse off, but that may change as some of the contracts that I thought had started clearly hadn't. Interestingly, gross profit was up, which as another poster suggested, this may well be due to savvy cost savings, so bravo to the Bod if that is the case. Not so positive. It seems the NHS could well be dispensing with our services. The Bod have talked a good game with excuse after excuse. Contract delay / NHS priorities / the Bod remain confident, well, if that was the case and £000's of money has been saved, them why would certain NHS bodies have removed clients from this programme? There are a few contracts, ones that we already (or most of us) knew, are under 'evaluation', which means ended in my opinion. The Bod has boldly said Newham has ended, so I suppose the 'evaluation' comment is this years new 'carrot'. So, we have this remarkable service that the NHS decided to can their patients because it offered them excellent, bespoke support, and also saved them thousands of pounds.......? And now we are considering working directly with the public? How will that be funded? Certainly not by the NHS. If they don't wish to renew trials / pilots with 50-100 patients, which i imagine is more cost effective than lower numbers, then why would they continue to pay out? I can't see this being for privately. I doubt many folk with an LTC has money to burn. A certain percentage are likely to be out of work. Anyway, our past performance in the private sector was appalling to say the least. Still, I wonder how much money the 'Direct to Consumer model' will cost us poor investors. I mentioned in a post or two back about our so-called business model. It seems now, that's it about to change all over again. No wonder Wendy isn't putting her hand in her pocket, and no wonder the contract drought has been so apparent. Good luck to us all. We are going to need it.

What I don't understand is in this 'day and age' (I sound as old as Mega and Knigelk) how on earth can an iPhone auto predict the word Nostradamus incorrectly? Predictive text appears to work one day and then let's me down on another. I suppose that's probably comparable to some companies that I'm invested in....

Mega thought this week, Cashking thought today, and now you Knigelk, you have also gone down the Nostradadamus route and are predicting next week. When will this madness end......

Okay poke. I'll take your word for it. And I'll hold you to it.

D'uuuuuuh. Of course..... "As a result of these contract delays revenue for the year ended 31 December 2014 will be below current market expectations, with net loss for the same period being greater than current market expectations." Apologies. I've reach the above half a dozen time and I've had that reverberating in my ears, just like my irritating Tinnitus, for the last 5-months. I suppose the question is; how much of a % drop do we believe we will incur? Clearly that is why no one is buying into this outfit. I think the road to getting my money back has just become ever more distant.

Oooooh, I've missed that one. Where did the Bod say that the year end results will be below market expectations? I know they said that in their last trading (excuse) update but I wasn't aware they had already strung that same line for the year end too. Shame on them.

That's all this share is. Apathetic. Investors are disinterested, as judged by the incredibly low trading taking place. Sure, the canny may be looking at buying in once the grim year end results come out but I do wonder if that will happen. And yes, I say grim as I fail to see how anything else they can be. Is TLY the business model that some wise men (and women) herald this to be for the NHS? If that were true, may be someone should tell the NHS... I suppose the TLY PR team could announce on Twitter when their results will be published. Would that spark some interest? Probably not, but what it would show is that the Bod are at least communicating with their shareholders at some level. But at least I could fully support their efforts for doing so. Surely even the hardcore few are bored of their excuses about being well positioned and our business model is well placed. Business model? I think I heard of that once. Still waiting, Wendy....

I would just like to add that I never reported King75. I found his posts full of wisdom, vision and he was an orator for the truth. I'd place him along side the great Churchill (the leader and not the dog). Mega, Annoyingly, Knigelk has been an incredibly avid supporter of TLY but, I don't believe that is your 'beef' with him. He and Cashking have been immensely loyal over here, just like Churchill (the dog and not the leader). Roll on news. The TLY bread has turned unpalatable with staleness.

I'll cancell the Police Bulletin now that I know you're watching from afar. I'm sure we will speak more when the results materialise. Behave yourself until then.

I do love speculation regards what may / may not happen. In a world of AIM world where gaining money is incredibly hard to come by, all we know we have for sure and that is the meticulous art of speculation and debate regards if's / buts and maybes. That said: I wouldn't say Cashking is a muppet. He's just very fond of TLY. And sitting on a loss like most / all of us. I'm treating the run up to the year end results Rns similarly to Christmas. I find the anticipation of it overshadows the actual occasion. (I was thinking of Turkey jokes but I'm as curious as every other investor regards our financial status). ATB.

"However, in the second half of the year the Company has experienced delays in the signing of new contracts and renewals with a small number of CCGs, a Commissioning Support Unit (CSU) and a specialist healthcare organisation, all of which were expected to contribute revenues in the year ended 31 December 2014. The Board of Totally is confident that these delayed contracts will be successfully executed and will contribute positively to the out-turn for the Company in 2015." So, when are these plethora of contracts in 2015 meant to begin? Was it that lighting quick and we've missed it? Were the Bod just speaking of the BHF and Leic contract? Last years Year End results were released by now. The Bod still have time to produce their results and there is no urgency. I have to wonder (due to last years results comin out mid-May) are they scrambling around with a new contract, hoping to include that in their results? Or even news of equity dilution? I can almost guarantee there will be their classic one liner, which will be; 'The Bod remain confident of converting contracts in the second half of 2015.......Zzzzz'. I hope they don't come out with that platitude as its surely time they started to deliver what they say they can achieve.

Spike, An excellent find. This is the small caption that G&WCCG spoke of TLY. "VI. Totally Health Totally Health is a tele-coaching service that provides innovative Long Term Conditions Management solutions to transform behaviour to achieve better health outcomes for patients with long term conditions. This in turn reduces emergency admissions to secondary care. Empowering patients to self-care in the community will result in a better quality of life for patients, improved condition outcomes, and a reduction in inappropriate A&E attendances and savings for the CCG." As always, TLY divulge nothing and investors are forced to find the answers themselves, which is a point that was stressed to young Mega. It seems it's only news that certain folk wish to read are welcome on this board. Bravo again , Spike.

How many times do you keep pulling at the contract thread regards new recruits. If the Bod treat their staff like their shareholders, then I'm not surprised if staff leave and TLY frequently recruit. And don't forget. After every contract we have habitually retraced. Who would buy in now?

Contracts? Plural? So, we surmise after £700 worth of buys we think that's a sign for contracts coming soon? If Wendy bought some shares after the year end results I may have more faith but we can second guess she won't. Why hasn't the CEO bought shares in her own company at spontaneous times? Especially when the Sp has been at historic lows. I guess we will never find out. And, I've still had no reply from theBod. Where's my medal.....

I've heard of that. I had always hoped we were involved with Tele Health but Cashking has always said we are just 'pure Health Coaching' and Mega said Tele Health didn't necessarily suit our current business model. I don't agree with their comments but this company is where it is. (IMO a bit of a mess). And that is why I'm pleased Admin remove those links as they are quite damning on our company. Tradingstock, Please only upload links related to this company, and make sure you have sought the necessary approval to upload those links too. This company has a bigger enough battle with its lack of contracts without you putting us in a bad light. I don't believe for a second you did it out of spite it's more likely that you didn't think. Many thanks.

I think it's fair to say something is quite seriously amiss with the lack of contract news. Last year was promising but, the Sp and market thought vey differently as they didn't recognise the value of the low level contracts that we were awarded. Regards contract renewals, only Leicester has been consistent, which suggests out services aren't necessarily ticking the boxes with the other ccgs. Even our one and only GP contract in Derby's didn't renew, or didn't continue with their 'winter pressure' scheme. On the balance of probabilities, you would have to say we're failing somewhere and the blame can't lie with all those different ccgs. I don't think it's fair to blame it on political factors. You can't even say the market read it wrong last year as they've valued this Sp fairly by our current standings. Certain folk blame the Purdah restrictions on Governmental contracts being restricted to negate favouritism, folk blame 'closed periods' for the lack of Bod share purchases. It's time the excuses stopped and Wendy answered these questions and showed more transparency with contracts / performance / renewal status. ATB.

I can understand why people who have bought in here above 10-pence as they may get stung, but those who bought in below will see a return. Is the vote primarily regards whether the deal goes through or is it also to do with this CVR? I thought there had been a warning amongst the paperwork thats been delivered advising against UK holders approving the loan notes?

Good afternoon, A good friend of mine has some shares in FTO and he's slightly puzzled with regards to a letter that he has received. He is under the impression that he is going to receive a payment for his shares, which I understand the acquisition is around 10-pence. He has owned these shares since they were 7-pence in around 2005-ish. I would have thought, what often occurs in T/O's is, he would receive equal value shares in the new buyers company (Fortune Dynasty) With regard to the 'contingent' 5-pence. Does anyone know what the contingency is, or is this simply a dangling carrot encouraging the vote to go ahead only for it never to come about? Regards.