Member Info for gemstar

It is unclear whether repayment for refinancing is at par

Anyone seen the actual text of the bonds?

It's what I would expect every well run company to have. A secured stand by facility
Secured not on assets but on shares rather than BP itself

Respect for manning up, Robbo

This robjprofit is a known excitable speculator and trader on Advfn, up and down the whole time like a tarts knickers
Best filtered

 Dodge not credible.

Completely un-believable in any form.

Just a sad and complete time waster.

Obviously  suffering from some form of malignant neurosis

What's the Prem cash position?

Did I read that there's a minerals conference next Tuesday and Wednesday?

"to get to my previously discussed $100M target and doubling of shareprice"
Is not Panr at present capitalised at $100m ?

No point to consolidation

They could easily get an issue away at 0.11+

Still think it would need to be of prospectus standard
Plus having to divert a team to deal with the inevitable questions
Still feel that $600,000? investment and recent statement by AP on "the RNS" means something is close

The SRK report is for financiers

If it is released to the market it would need to be of prospectus standard, which would involve further cost, and endless questions

Ie if Vast was incorporated in Switzerland and was issuing 5% of its shares on a dual listing in the UK to an entity, it would not have to notify the UK market because it would be notifying the market in Switzerland, where it is incorporated and where its main listing is

Yes Sandy. At 30% Takeover Rules apply
The purpose of the 5% rule is to give the market advance notice that a stake is being built up ,which may or may not lead to a bid
I assume the exemption is because if Vast were incorporated in Switzerland etc, it would not have to notify the market in the UK, because it would be notifying the market in Switzerland under equivalent rules

Is what is being said means that if a party wishes to make a bid for Vast, all he has to do is incorporate the bidder in Switzerland etc, and then go up to 29% without having to disclose anything?

I think not my Lord

I too was outraged by the Marconi fiasco. Years of patient work by Weinstock destroyed overnight by Simpson and "abrasive " Mayo ,jettisoning all Weinstocks work, chasing the dot com boom
Their antics destroyed Weinstock and his wealth
IMO the position here is entirely different. They are trying to build something. Yes, the process is taking aeons, but we are working in Romania and Zimbabwe

I repeat what Yorgi said on his Advfn thread where the Primorus statement appeared. Yorgi is an old hand on those boards

"Routy, I would take any such comments from John Casey (previously Temmujin) with a pinch of salt. If you look back at his posting history you will see numerous such posts "rumour" or the favourite "my mate in the city told me". In my opinion a complete work of fiction, check back through his posting history and make your own mind up. Although I do agree with Ianio so much news overdue.

My thoughts are that there are a lot of troublemakers on this board
The naive 2pence now filtered along with the Fantasy troublemaker

hTTps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-12/fall-armyworm-invades-china-wreaks-havoc-agriculture-lands

Because, 2p, may be this institutional investor wanted to be given a chance to subscribe at the ground floor, as well as financing the thing later when the price is higher