RE: I think16 Oct 2024 14:59
Fonters, that would certainly be the key piece of the puzzle that can only be positive. If they drop another acquisition stinker like Monday this will be heading to .60-.70p. That's when I'll be back in. Not convinced that 0.80-0.90p is going to hold simply because of the threat of dilution for another average acquisition. Hopefully they do make another acquisition like Monday's. It would be great to pick up 10m shares for the same amount I paid last time :) If not, c'est la vie.
Lincolnshire, if they're a producer and listed in the US, Canada or Australia then I agree. But they're not. The lse is a basket case full of every possible commodity company being valued at roughly half of their Nth American and Australian peers. This will be no different unless it gets the herd treatment like 88e, GGP or EUA. When members of those herds start popping up en-masse here then all rational thinking goes out the window. I also invested in Uranium years ago. Got absolutely burned by an Australian company called Paladin. What I do agree with however is that Uranium is a key commodity for the future, like Copper. Go and check out ATYM to see what a great copper company looks like by the way, and then look at its valuation. The company is a producer, pays a dividend, located in Spain with huge EU backing, holds 10% of its mcap in net cash, +10 years of production in RESERVES (note the word folks), significant exploration upside, solar plant coming online this quarter, Elix online this quarter (higher margin), and it's still valued at f@ck all. Compare and contrast to here. Talk of £400m mcap is plain silly when they're printing shares like confetti and don't have any funding to do anything let alone build a mine (which takes years when including all permits etc).
If £12m mcap falls it's straight to £10m. That would be perfect timing for a big bet.