Member Info for Fyoz

"they why are you whining about dividend payments and buyback .."

You don't moderate this bb. Start your own discussion group if you want to control the content

"only people wanting a divi now or a buyback are short termers .. looking for their target %"

I've been in this over 6 years so that is quite frankly utter nonsense

"Do you agree fyoz?"

No, my original post currently has 28 rec's so sentiment sides with me at the moment. However, since we've had an excellent explanation from BBN of why it's not prudent to use cash right now I'm prepared to carry on waiting for a while longer yet. And I suspect many who rec'd the original post are as well

The thrust of the post though, to halt the SP slide, is still relevant in my opinion

For your considerate, well constructed and courteous post, rather than the soundbite replies telling me what I can't suggest etc. So far 26 readers have rec'd my post which means there is some discontent within the shareholder base regarding the current SP. However, I'm sure many of those will be reassured by your post (as I am), as to why BMN have to preserve cash right now

Kindest regards

"I do not consider it to be in my best interests"

You're fully entitled to your opinion Alfacomp. Am I?

"A special divi is not what is in investors best interest."

You've no idea what's in my best interests

Let's see which of our posts gets the most rec's then Alfacomp. It will be a gauge of the sentiment of PI's frequenting this bb

This SP slide has to be halted. If we're meant to be trying to attract more institutional investors, the SP has to managed better. I get the argument for preserving cash to pay for growth, but sooner or later some of that profit has to be returned to shareholders. Otherwise what's the point of being invested in BMN? When will the 'growth phase' end? Once we're producing electrolyte in quantity? I doubt it. We'll need all the cash then for the VRFB factory. Will we get a dividend then? Maybe not, maybe Fortune will then want to start making solar panels, so we can be the fully integrated energy provider. What comes after that, what else can we grow into? I understand his desire to make BMN a big, successful company, but what about shareholders that have had to put up with a declining SP for almost a year now, without an end in sight? It's time now to pay that special dividend and put a proper support level under the SP. Not all of us want to wait another 5 years to get a return

"The vote has nothing to do with me being right ( although I am )
It has everything to do with getting this over and done by bringing this to an end ASAP."

You didn't vote, and if you had you would have been a minuscule minority, but you insist you're right?

It has nothing to do with bringing this to an end ASAP, it's all about getting it started ASAP

I think it means the overwhelming majority want the relist to happen as quick as possible, so that we can use our funds as we see fit. The longer we're locked out the more chance of losing the lot

Hopefully not much longer to wait now

q u a d r i s e s h a r e h o l d e r s

without the spaces

replace all the *** with

********************

Ron

I agree with LF that there is some very good info on the company website

There is a wealth of knowledge on the forum as well, in fact I really don't understand the LTH who haven't joined. Maybe if they did they wouldn't be so angry or angst-ridden

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/********************/

"I will only being doing that if there is a firm confirmation that QFI are close to signing a commercial agreement..."

How will you know if they're close?

I've just been re-reading the services agreement
RNS, I really like the last 9 words:-

"As was the case with our arrangements with Aleph in Kuwait, the agreements are structured to align all parties to the delivery of near-term substantive project delivery milestones - which will ultimately create significant shareholder value for Quadrise."

3rd:- "Who invests into a company and then votes yes to giving all their gains to the director ? : )"

Answer:- 100% of the shareholders that voted on that resolution

But of course you know better than all of those eh 3rd?

"There's also, of course, a structural speed reduction with slow steaming that also improves fuel efficiency."

How desperate does that sound? We can be cheaper if we go slower. The flaw in that argument is that if your competitors are using cheaper fuel they can go faster, get the goods there quicker. Who's going to get more trade?

"No more tired than you peddling the same ramp after ramp, fyoz, and you've done that for longer than 2 years"

The difference is Hawky that I openly admit to being a holder, and yes I believe the company will ultimately be successful. So what is your reason for posting? Good Samaritan, trying to save us from ourselves or a shorter trying desperately to help lower the SP?

Go on give us a forecast. Hope you closed out on your last one in July ("Nailed on sub 4p today. The end is nigh!") because 2 weeks later it was 36% higher . . .

. . . people, the SP usually rise after on of Hawky's 'sell' recommendations

Don't you get tired of peddling the same 'QFI are doomed' message Hawky? You've been at it for at least a couple of years now, presumably you think eventually you'll be right?

Let's see if you've got the cohones to come back in October when we're flying, and admit you were wrong all along

"but I welcome this RNS as it can set people's anxiety to rest."

Not sure I agree with that Dust, still too much uncertainty for some