Member Info for Fukurokuju79

It's not a fake anything. Last time I said that we had an RNS the next day!
Besides I'll post as and when I like but thanks anyway.
I'm simply saying while bottom feeders like you and the others are here I decide life has better things to offer.
Night

By golly - new accounts piping up like hot rocks at a BBQ.
Anyone suspect an agenda, or people with multiple accounts.
Time to retire from the board I think. Not worth it. See you when we hear news.
F79

I always get replies stating not for social media. Ithink he is covering himself mainly as there has been occassions where he has been inundated, and things mis interpreted.
I remember I've shared info here before and got pretty much abuse so if I have doubts I engage direct generally.

I agree. If this hits, this early on in KSZ then game on. If it doesn't then the each of the other projects alone are potential company makers.
I and a number of you have Ben here a while and so have a comfort blanket of sorts but I still think this is a very great entry.
I've only got about a quarter of 1% of the company so not a scratch on some of you but plenty for me here. I'm fully invested elsewhere so can't really add more ATM.
Wouldn't rule out adding in the coming weeks though

Atb

A lot of the queries raised in here.
It's startedc so now it's a waiting game.

Atb

If ARCM hit 2p, and nothing has materially changed in why I invested, I probably would Ella!
I see a bargain, you may see danger. I guess that's what makes the market.
My method/s and research has been very successful for me overall so trust myself.
Atb

At sub 3p.
That'll do now. Can't keep adding. When it rises again I'll be happy lol

Ok APD.
It's been and enlightening and rewarding conversing with you. Thanks for your tips.
Atb

APD..
Regarding your remarkable, friendly, informative post below.....

'Dont' need your atb, keep it to yourself.

I started a topic, those of who who try to make a joke of it, got it back from me. So it wasn't me who first started, those who did know and I repeat I don't take **** online or otherwise and those who try to be fresh with me will get back. Do you understand?'

I suppose you realise how much like a three year old you sound. I'd didn't start it, they did, lol.

No one is getting fresh I'm afraid. I'd suggest you've a large bag of chips on your shoulder, an anger management issue and are basically a brave keyboard warrior.
Assuming that's what you mean then yes I understand.

Atb to you

APD it wasn't a lecture it was a point of view....'dude'

Oh and I'm not with a 'lot' I'm afraid. I speak for myself. As for your point on not considering your natural disaster risk thread you can make what assumptions you like. Not skin off my nose.
Im going to make an assumption that you've got a chip on your shoulder, lack a sense of humour and based on your posts I've probably forgotten more than you know about assessing risk and the stock market in general.

It appears you're happy to make assumptions and assertions about everyone else but sadly unable to accept the same back.

As for '' I am wrong up enough to be your grand father's age.'' I've no idea what that means and even more relevantly I see no relationship between your age and anything we've been discussing. It's was the sort of this I may have focused on when I was five years.

Atb to you.

APD - I second what Bertie said in reply to your short and rather insulting attitude. It's not people being 'naive'.
Yes, risk has to be considered and managed but part of that management is perspective i.e. how likely is the risk to occur and how significant is the potential impact of that risk. ?

Natural disasters are not unique to Rambler, or the industry. I would argue that more relevant and more important sector risks exist.... geographical/political risks like political stability, mining policies, tax regimes and/or corruption etc. Geology, commerciality of any asset, infrastructure, capital revenues to maintain capex and opex costs, dilution/free float/volatility, sentiment, commodity pricing, exchange rate risk etc etc

These are all the things that need extra assessment before making an investment IMO.
Then all the risks need to be weighed against the current Vs assumed future market cap of the opportunity. Ultimately the appetite for risk will likely be greater with a higher expectation of returns, and conversely lower risk appetite where there is a lower expectation of returns.

But long story short is don't label people naive simply because they decided to have fun with your thread on a day of good news, when they were jubilent, rather than wanting to focus on low probability risk events that quite frankly should have been considered before putting any money into a stock.
IMO I see your comments as being naive, and rude and not the replies of those on this board.

Atb though

Ella regarding >> 'I sold the vast majority of my shares when it was well above 5p. You called me all sorts when I suggested there was an issue with the mining licence. Who are you calling thick?? :-)))))))'

Well that was some time ago wasn't it though as you've said for ages you sold most and have only a very tiny position here. Yes the shareprice is lower than you sold but that's the only reason you have to try prove you're right. If Fulmar had said that at 8p what would your comeback have been to define how brilliant you are.
The way I see it is you don't believe in ARCM as an investment (which is fine) and those that do (most here) won't sell at whatever today's price is as we see much more significant future value. We would argue that actually as an investor you should seek out the hidden undervalued stocks and this is where arcm sit as at today.
The fact you don't value ARCM yet still knock around this board shows me either you've a screw lose, are embittered, are not trustworthy or indeed not very clever

Atb

I was adding in way down and managed to keep the faith in my research.
Looking forward to the call tomorrow.
GL all

Not a natural risk but I've heard djg and the RMM short crew are masterminding a copper eating nano bot that they plan to release from drones over the Ming mine. Crazy times

Each to their own and all, but shorts make max 100% (non leveraged) if the company being shorted goes bust, plus cant do within tax efficient wrapper (apart from say an ETF). Easier less risky ways to make 100% IMO.
Don't get me wrong I'd consider shorts in a bear market (probably a short passive ETF tracker of an index) if that's all there was to look for (albeit I haven't up to now).
Find long stocks in a market uptrend and short stocks/defensive positioning in a downtrend...follow the path of least resistance.
Makes no sense here with RMM though IMO, especially not when Darren did it after completion of financing and progress as being reported. LOL
Could have made more than 100% from the lows in RMM being long (I topped up) and still have further upside potential without the constraints of potential gains from a short.
Ah well - we all make our own choices.

'Added to Short' - Moron

...that is all

Across all metrics in October. Got to say very strong month.

Well undervalued

I agree aprogerson and personally I can't see NvS giving him anything, especially at the cost of FCF and being detrimental to ARCM. NvS is fairly stubborn IMO and won't offer anything unless he is absolutely forced to.
I'm not sure if MM etc have any real leverage given he apparently loan sharked his stock, it doesn't seem he has much chance of winning his cases he has got charged against himself that seems to have more legs.
Time will tell but ATM I'm not concerned.
I took the chance to add some more although I wasnt going to.

A full blown acquisition at project level (zam) is not impossible, but not company level IMO. This has been considered as a potential reason for the unexpected acquisition in the KCB and there is a view this was potentially a strategic transaction signposting a potential full project acquisition (to avoid aim rule 15 cash shell).
I have mixed views on the above and am therefore open to all potential outcomes in the form of a deal.
The most important thing for me is that we have competition with multiple interested majors under NDAs, plus we have a CEO who is clearly happy to try and obtain the best deal possible, or no deal if it's not suitable. Beyond that im sure all options have been discussed at the table.

Atb

Was another tweet about drilling an hour or so ago..said...

> > Here’s the first meter we drilled for our 'Proof of Concept' campaign in the #KSZ

Since then we've:

- Completed 2 holes, with the 3rd nearing TD
- Extracted 350m of promising Proterozoic core
- Conducted 1st DHEM survey
-Identified a new conductor

It's coming together... #KAV. < <