Member Info for Fruitsnveg

I thin you meant NDA! ?

If you are correct about (1) then it will be accompanied by (2) imo, as you can’t really have one without the other.

Also, just by the by, has the company specifically called them ‘trials’ or referred to them only as ‘studies’ in past comms?

I don't think they'll be aiming to going it 100% alone at this point, or looking to tempt a later BD&L deal. I think they would benefit now from a collaborating partner who can offer a de-risked development path via trials to drug approval with the regulator(s) (and thus commercialisation). But one where Synairgen retains a large degree of control. That would be a pleasing result imho, and perfectly doable too.

Nice to wake up to another published paper today. The evidence that the drug merits further investigation is certainly stacking up...

A new human case just reported in Michigan.

https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/22/bird-flu-in-humans-michigan-reports-h5n1-infection-in-dairy-farm-worker/

This underlines the urgent need for better surveillance / testing, and better drugs to develop and stockpile therapeutic drugs.

That's a sad story DocDan. You could always give it a happy ending. Nothing is set in stone. There's still time.

Https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-22/bird-flu-avian-influenza-human-detection/103879886

Your posting history shows a long litany of complaints in every company you've "invested" in. Can't fathom how anyone puts money into every company they utterly despise. Perplexing.

Why would anyone take down this post? Your conspiracy theories are wild DocDan, wild.

Let's just leave it here as a testament to your getting caught out in your own tangled web of 'alternative facts'.

Perhaps Bobby Axelrod will pay us a quick visit with one of his 'setting sun emojis' and we can put it all behind us....

Agree. Now that DocDan and Joey's accusation that the company was incompetent has been proven to be thoroughly incorrect, we can indeed move on.

Yawny yawn.

Joking obvs Doc83 - you're safe.

How do you know I'm not your wife?

:-)

As for "hoping the majority of the sites were able to collect a sample considering the $30,000 per patient we were paying", I'm sure the patients whose blood couldn't be sampled due to their untimely death regret not being able to give you a return on that $30,000 investment.

You didn't realise it wasn't possible for all sites?

Well now you know - it was NEVER agreed for ALL sites likely due to the unique challenges that pandemic ICU's were anticipated to be. Anyone who "assumed" it was should have read the protocol.

You need to read the small print of the protocol, what was actually agreed. Here is what the Sprinter trial protocol, rubber stamped by the Regulator, says on page 46:

"6.13.2 blood sample for immunogenicity testing

A blood sample will be taken as per the study schedule for immunogenicity testing.

This will be completed in all sites, and for all patients, WHERE COLLECTION OF SAMPLES IS FEASIBLE. (1*)

If a site is not able to participate in immunogenicity sample collection, THIS WILL NOT PRECLUDE THEM IN THE STUDY."

(*1). Let's just assume they added that caveat understandably because Covid trials were happening in a time of unparalleled chaos in ICU's around the world. Many didn't have enough or any oxygen tanks, PPE, masks, never mind adequate blood sample kits and staff to do those samples - remember Italy, Argentina, etc?*

The company did not intend to do blood samples for all patients because they knew that was impossible across all sites in a rapidly changing and challenging pandemic situation - and they were correct. It was NEVER their intention to guarantee that, as stated in the protocol.

JoeyDiamond, where did it say in the trial protocol that the company intended to collect blood samples for all Sprinter patients?

Oh, little Bobby Axelrod is back with pictures of sunrises?

lol

"UNIVERSAL's results are utterly predictable and of no use whatsoever."

I feel you are not well suited to this type of investment. You judge well before you learn the meaning of the significance of things, constantly 2nd guessing worst case scenarios only to then end up disappointed, which feels rather an intentional MO than a true shortcoming..... That level of ignorance will only lead to disillusionment, you are right. Confucius say maybe time to sell you shares as you see no further upturn here. Why hang on to them? It's not like you believe in the drug or the company's prospects. Maybe invest in Verona, Sanofi and Regeneron. As you say; "Companies with modern tailor-made drugs that offer long term solutions - even using inhalation as a delivery mechanism ( just imagine !!) - for COPD and most likely every other RVI out there".

You sound increasingly bitter DocDan, worried that the company might one day succeed?