Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Interesting ferret comment. Suggest you go and do your own research Doc.Dan, no reason why I or others should do the grunt work anymore for you? You have questions that you want answered? Time to roll up those slippery sleeves and dig.
TP, that study has been superseded in 2023. NIH, new guidelines for clinicians. Available on t'internet. I'm sure between you and SpacDaneeka you can find it and bury any positive content quite skillfully.
I know it's been done Doc.Dan, that's what I said. Do keep up.
No Ernie :-)
And it's recently been published (Nov 23). It appears the UoS team have been very busy!!
Good study which shows it's been done. Although it is for surfactant, it nonetheless found the use of "novel breath-synchronised delivery" using a "vibrating mesh nebulizer in mechanically ventilated patients". There are further studies on other aerosolized treatments which also show efficient delivery of drug to the lungs.
Just my opinion but I would say the ventilated patients would be very carefully selected (risk v benefit) as the right targets likely to respond. I wouldn't see it as a 'give everyone on a ventilator a puff' thing. I think that would be risky and wasteful. You want to give the right patient the right drug at the right time, IMHO.
The study of nebulized medications to ventilated patients is not new, nor is it lacking in data, so I would guess that the regulators won't baulk. Ventillated patients receive all manner of treatments, some nebulized, such as aerosolized antibiotics. Of course there will be strict technical requirements to be followed when treating these patients, and risk, but that goes with most treatments on hospitalised patients.
There's so much you don't know SpacDaneeka. And it's clear that really irks you..... Ho hum.
I'm not in the leas bit worried about a funding solution. Whatever fretful nonsense you're selling today, I'm not buying it. You inferred that the regulator could stop us from bringing our drug to market without proof of funding. They don't worry about such silliness. If the drug is worthy of approval, rest assured, there won't be a shortage of £ backers.
PS: Where's Doc.Dan, or can't you both post using the same keyboard at the same time, lol.
Your arguments get more ridiculous as the days go on Spacdaneeka.
You are mixing up Regulator role versus Investor role.
NOWHERE is it written that the regulator has any oversight for the "trial applicant’s capacity to bring the product to market". That is just made up nonsense.
The regulator does not care about the funding of a company, not does it have any say in company finances.. Their interest lies in all things drug, not commercial viability. If that was the case, many drugs would have never made it to market, much less one with blockbuster potential.
Https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12964925/World-leaders-meet-Davos-thrash-plan-protect-against-Disease-X-hypothetical-pandemic-kill-20-times-people-Covid.html
"World leaders meet in Davos to thrash out plan to protect against 'Disease X' - a hypothetical pandemic that could kill 20-times more people than Covid. Disease X represents a hypothetical, currently unknown pathogen. It was added to the WHO's list of nine priority diseases in 2018."
"DailyMail.com previously spoke to three virus experts who agreed a respiratory virus — spread via droplets from coughs and sneezes — was most likely to trigger the next fast-spreading disease that causes a global shutdown."
It's good to see that the Davos crowd remain focussed on finding future antivirals to combat the next pandemic.
Doc.Dan only leaves so he can slip into one of his other characters. It's like a one-man Broadway show where all the actors are the same.
Ghia November 2023: "I don’t hold anything on the London stock exchange currently. It’s really underperforming."
Ghia Jan 2024: Must buy back in before news drops and the SP takes off. Gotta trash the SP first though.
They've sent in the Party Planner, so we must be approaching the end of this tedious line-up of fake muppet accounts soon, surely?
Ghia, Have you thought about making TFG aware of his incredible oversight in their due diligence? I'm sure they are deeply worried about the cost benefit of SNG001 being non-existent. So much so that they continued to increase their stake here AFTER Sprinter. Lolz.
Thanks for that stunning insight SpacDaneeka. Who knew you also had a strong opinion on Mankowski's appointment, - until now. Lol.
I think you are missing the point Doc.Dan, which is no doubt is intentional. To recap, it really doesn't matter WHO is doing the CMO role. The important point is that Synairgen hired a CMO to start in November 2023. They have a plan, and in that plan will be a number dependencies, which require a fulltime CMO, to be involved from certain date. It is a crucial full-time role at this point. There will be many activities both concurrent and dependent, which even if you don't know what they are, rest assured that they are happening now Mankowski has been brought in at 100% capacity. Those activities don't need your blessing to happen., they will be being done regardless of your yelping here.
TP,
If all the comments posted here by invested LTHs are "not currently relevant to my Synairgen investment", why post here everyday? What does that serve you?
I see you are triggered by the mere mention of Mankowski, Doc. Dan.
We must be getting warm!