Member Info for Foxhill

If someone gives me all the ingredients for a beef wellington and it happens to come out right the first time, that doesn’t make me an expert.

“It is often the case when a company..”

That is probably why we’re still waiting for MS2

Just because Westminster decided to re-invent itself post SL doesn’t make us experts. They saw a new direction for the business that was otherwise just about failing to tick over.

Yeah, happy to wave the wager. ‘You want it?

You could be the first.

Have have been out completely over the last 18 month. FOMO isn’t an issue any more. If either contract lands - or there’s a rise on a meaningful update - i’ll probably be gone again...

Yeah, happy to wave the wager. ‘You want it?

You could be the first.

They’re all dogs. It’s AIM. Westminster of course is unrelenting quality.

Frequently.

Fortunately, had some cracking results elsewhere. MKA was such a blinder that it was referred to the FCA!!

Nccl a couple of times and BMN. Didn’t put enough in that though. Gutted!!

Don’t mention the propshaft!! Or was it inadequate infrastructure? Yeah right!!

No- one can prove misleading unless you got into Bumbly and squirrelled around.

Nobody will get that opportunity.

But i think it’s evident, given the SP’s level, despite two ‘signed’contracts either of which would be transformational, that the market gives WSG no credence. There’s a reason for that.

The problem on this board is that if you question the validity of output, the likelihood of the BoD’s actually delivering the potential they unquestionably set out. You are a no life, nutter that should simply be ignored.

But, if you are one of those individuals - you’ve been right to air those reservations - seven years on the trot.

If however, you are a bull, and I was briefly, in the scheme of things. Your confidence in the capability of the board to deliver as outlined by them, in their own terms, in their RNS’s - has been entirely unjustified - for seven years on the trot.

So, I think the bears have it.

And another offer for a friendly wager is swerved. Because the conviction isn’t really there when push comes to shove.

That cracked record still gets played because it still accurately reflects WSG’s position.

Unless, and until... Soon, signed. Yawn.

I’m with you. They aren’t misleading.

They are meaningless.

Until somebody, and it ain’t going to be the UN places an order that genuinely justifies an RNS - with some numbers in it would be nice, this SP will just drift. The market isn’t interested in Blue chip blah blah. Unless they buy/licence/commission a shit load of something.

WSG lists Shell as a client, I believe, For heavens sake!!. True probably, years aaog. but irrelevant.

There were seven MoU’s, I believe, in 2015.

EA was already two years overdue.

There have been MoU’s confirmed since - and an undisclosed number signed post policy change - nudge, nudge, wink wink. So much going on. Progress all over the place, but ALWAYS, insufficient to get the commitment they need for a client, any client, to countersign.

PF will very probably stand up again at this year’s AGM, as he has done since they decided they were airport security specialists, having got through another year without closing a deal.

I wouldn’t put it past him, assuming Donald doesn’t do a 180, to get through ‘19 without closing a deal.

Africa. 3 months and counting. What was the point of PF & Chair’ going to Africa holding hands with all that they hoped that would infer, if there was another 3 to 6 months, plus’ possibly - of process still to go?

Do you fancy a bet that the AGM comes and goes without?

Which year was that Ned?

The problem in tech is that innovation is ongoing so if you spend four years honing something for a client that ‘might’ order a couple of hundred units. A) that tech probably isn’t innovative any more and B) the process won’t have been commercially viable. When/if we develop a product that has mainstream applications - and it gets merketed properly then we might have something. Massive addressable markets are marvellous if you’re product is well received.

Zero might get there. CropX might get there. Fcuk knows what Bosch are doing. Watchlock? Should sell, but I bet the numbers are tiny given the time and money invested.

Or 7 years (yes YEARS!!) to close a MS contract.

Can’t rush these things.

Soon, final, imminent, Q4, signed. Etc.

Picking brains. I suspect there’s been some of that going on with the UN.

Must be a difficult path to tread sometimes. How much do you have to offer to demonstrate capability - without handing all your research/IP over for nowt.

Tell Bosch too. It’s taken them two years to get a product (that presumably they already liked) to market...

Zzzz

Made me chuckle!!

I’m not hanging around that long to find out. I’m give Bosch another couple of months - then I’m gone.

I’m not hanging around that long to find out. I’m give Bosch another couple of months - then I’m gone.

He’d be a great board appointment to help us manage all those port managed service contracts that we’re working on - just the man!!