Member Info for Foxhill

If it’s all about IKA - what were we going to do if we’d signed this in 2016?

I agree to exercise restraint, and hope not to punch you on the nose.

Unfortunately.

There is no obligation on me to exercise the aforementioned restraint.

I know, I punched you last time. This time will be different.

An agreement, not contract, where;

“There is NO OBLIGATION for WIMC TO ORDER ANY UNITS under the agreement and therefore there is no guarantee that WIMC will ultimately order the maximum number of units indicated under the new agreement...”

That renders it pretty meaningless in my book.

A whole article without mentioning corruption!! :-)

I haven’t read the RNS properly. Wouldn’t be the first time!!

I take issue with point 3.

The client hasn’t committed - there’s “no obligation”. That renders the new agreement meaningless.

We have a client, that didn’t order what they said they would last time, ordering another smallish amount, discounted, against the suggestion they’ll order more than originally suggested.

But there’s no contractual commitment. And this is all a pre-existing arrangement. I’m not surprised the SP has not responded. It’s just raking old coals.

You are biting too readily. As with a lot of arguments, you both have a point.

Ultimately, STAR is undervalued.

The market doesn’t get/understand/believe, Take your pick, or select a few.

Hence the share price.

It’ll stay that way until significant orders are placed. Preferably with an obligation. That last RNS was nuts.

That’d be Mission Improbable.

Tick tock doesn’t work. Ticking might generate excitement in Mission Impossible - but here at WSG we do something between Lunar cycles and Christmas’s.

Might make sense to knock them out at cost, for the recurring.

So a variation of an existing agreement that didn’t happen, with no obligations, that might.

Or have I misunderstood.

Folk are selling because the Dont think WSG will sign anything.

Dizzying values elsewhere are borne of hope that transformational blah blah will materialise.

If this were an oiler, we’d probably be on our sixth or seventh duster. Diluted to death and be on our fourth CEO - or delisted. Fortunately we have one little donkey in an oilfield in SL that was gifted.

Else WSG would be (John Cleese voice, pause) Dead.

Well that’s f’in depressing isn’t it. Confirmation is only with 5p more than speculation. And both fall short of target.

I get fed up with folk spewing numbers with little more substance than their own hope/aspiration/exit strategy in mind. Especially when a share takes off. The ‘prediction is usually a healthy number of ticks below their planned exit, cos you’ve got to maintain interest as you slip away. Blah blah.

I haven’t a clue. Too many variables. I feel that the magical £1 will now require both contracts closed.

IF Iran gets signed, it depends on what elaboration WSG can give as to further in country expansion.

I’d hope Africa on it’s own would be worth 40p - but we have no details on that as yet. £/pax etc.

If you are going to read a BB, READ it.

I didn’t say I couldn’t see 40p. I didn’t even infer that 40 was ambitious?

You assumed.

I’d be interested to know if it’s just a groundless stab in the dark?

Indulge my curiosity. How do you arrive at 40p?

Nothing said on hear has any bearing on the SP. Unless it’s a job for security staff in Africa. :-)

No. That’s another that’s run and hidden.

Iran signed March 16.

Excellent, so I AM a shareholder, Alias.

Our’s or WSG’s ;-)

Like I said (and you haven’t addressed) the nutters are right this far and have more conviction.

No irrelevant news from any foreign/trade/interior ministers today?

We’re probably experts in pipeline security too - never done one. Ports too. Not so much ferries - though I seem to recall ongoing discussions elsewhere and ambition to be a premier ferry provider. Can’t be arsed to look for the quote.

So at least WASS is one step ahead.