RE: Shareholders need missing information to make informed decision on bid28 Dec 2025 20:43
SharketMare, completelt agree... some wriggle room for them. However, lets remember that when the Land levy tax was in play as early as June/July I believe, Dan was asked whether the ExploreCo plan/news was still planned for before year end. His answer (if I recall correctly to a number of investors asking the same question) was YES. So you need to factor that in.
PFS update on TAM / metal prices was also cited for year end. TAM drilling was said to be continuing with G-mining regardless of the bid. That was also mentioned on the MRE RNS. Also, the latter supports the base formula for working into the PFS. Eg...updated MRE first, then modelled PFS.
There are a number of other ongoing nws events i haven't mentioned. The EISA was also underway and planned for submission to Ecuador before year end. Infact, I think it had been submitted in October... but could be wrong.
CIPA was expected before year end. This was messaged by Dan long ago. It was also reiterated after the Ecaudor land levy suggesting it would not be held up. There's no reason why it cannot be released unless the Ecuador Gov are hanging on to it? Which in that case begs more questons than answers does it not?
The fact is, in summary, all the KEY VITAL events that our CEO promised us BEFORE year end have not been provided by the CEO yet at the same time he expects everyone to accept a pony 28p offer which is NOT based on that news nor does it 'REFLECT' it.
It's possible this news may land tomorrow... or over the next few weeks so lets not get the pitchforks out just yet. But lets at the very least try and get what was promised to shareholders 'delivered' so we can all make an informed decision.
That's fair. I'm sure it's forthcoming. I'm sure RodneyT and others will be very very disappointed if Dan fails to deliver the promised news releases. If he doesn't, then he's done half a job so perhaps he won't mind if we strip out half of his bonus options?? Sound fair?