Member Info for FlyingHigher

9p holds firm

Get out before next week

Walkers crisps aren't as nice as McCoys. That's the fundamental issue here.

There is plenty of time left on the sensing IP if it is worth something to someone. It's a big IF.

As it stands we're valued at less than cash and assets so it's obviously too cheap, but for good reason.

That's an excellent summary of Nanoco's problems

Something in the region of £30m would be my guess. A complete guess though.

I predict a formal sale process RNS very soon

Those pesky trolls

But with a Samsung litigation for the validity of the IP hanging over them. With that out of the way, it's a straightforward question of what is the value of Nanoco IP to any potential suitor?

Obviously little in display now, but sensing IP + assets will be worth something.

This is all set for a takeover now.

The leaders are going, the contracts have finished.

There's cash in the bank.

Nanoco is a blank canvass looking for new vision.

A formal sale process will start shortly in my opinion.

The question is how much is the IP worth?

That's a complete mystery!

Michael Edelman is making up a bed for Brian on his big Yacht sailing around the world on our money. A new series called 'Transformational travels' will be televised on E4 next month.

To be fair, it is valued at less than cash. I'll give you that. That does seem oversold, but you have to look at the context.

Talk about their prospects Magmanus

Magmanus you'll be here for a very long time if you try to trade this share.

Next update: Formal sale process.

Outcome: Bargain basement sale

I previously said the STM deal was over, only to be heckled by some ignorant spin doctors on here, most notably terrorwit, whose contributions to this forum are a complete embarrassment.

The RNS had the same tone as when Apple pulled out. It was intended to be ambiguous, which fooled some of us before, but not this time.

It said how gen 1 work had finished and wouldn't go any further.

Posters spun, accused others like me, of misinterpreting it and reading to much into the news. Now the evidence is clear.

I have no doubt that a legal challenge over the nature of Nanoco communications would be difficult, but what any poster with any credibility can see, is Nanoco's repeated attempts to pull the wool over investors' eyes, as they blatantly did with the settlement.

Defend this one Terrorwit. Let's hear you.

Your spin and attempts to present your self-proclaimed expertise is funny to me now. It's obvious to me that you're completely clueless about anything.

I've topped up. The £1400 transaction is mine.

The other two targets for the year: seeking a partner to finance the regulatory pathway for the vascular graft business and licensing AurTex™, our heart valve leaflet composite, are both ongoing.

This is a bit disappointing, despite the other positive news. I've always thought a takeover to be the most likely outcome for this though. Why would a massive partner bother partnering with a minnow like RUA?

We shall see.

More erectile dysfunction and complaints from my Mrs I suspect

Now under 200m shares in total.

This bodes well IF Nanoco can prove value.

The problem is after rolling over against Samsung, I don't think they'll achieve anything at all.

I'm back in