RE: Every TV seems to have QD29 Dec 2024 20:13
I will be amazed if this whole sale procedure isn't just another attempt to provoke an out of court settlement from the latest large-scale offender.
One theory I have always had is that someone involved in the Samsung/Apple (and possibly others') supply chain is the major culprit when it comes to breaching Nanoco patents. As a result, Nanoco realised their courtcase with Samsung was not as lucrative as first thought. They took a settlement, which was reasonable for the level of breach attributable to Samsung with the view to lining up a new legal battle soon after.
I'm not the only one to speculate on this point.
Who could it be? Who knows?
Even if the settlement is lower than Samsung's, we have substantially less shares in issue.
£50m at this point would really help us out. It would send the share price to a level where most of us could exit with a bit of profit and move on with our lives.
That is my prediction for 2025! £50m from the offending supplier in an out of court settlement.
Also, Nanoco shareholders buy a pirate ship and sink Michael Edelman's yacht.
Michael Edelman will be provided with a rubber dinghy in a transformational deal, which shareholders regard as a major inflection point for him.