RE: The Shadow of the Beaver is Elongated14 Oct 2019 11:45
Great find Broxy, lots of ifs but it might account for the rise, and I’m sure you’re right to say don’t read too much into potential claims against the state.
Trying to make head or tail of this, the argument now might be that dismissal of this appeal might open the way for BKY to claim against the govt for financial outlay since 2015. Perhaps because expenditure since then on licensing applications, works and infrastructure (mine and community), kit purchase etc, was all done acting in reliance on the govt approvals at that point (2015), and might be claimed back should licensing not now proceed for reasons outside BKY’s control. (The assumptions being that licensing was expected to proceed back in 2015, and no outlay could be claimed back if the govt authorisations in 2015 are ruled unlawful in the courts).
More simplistically, it might just simply be that an appeal against one previous authorization has failed, which removes a perceived hurdle, but there’s still the outstanding permits issues ongoing, which is still not looking great at the moment.
Most importantly though, where does the beaver fit into all of this? What’s it even doing here?