RE: Shadow buyer3 Feb 2022 12:04
Hey Wookie (10:02). The theory is that yes, absolutely a shadow buyer (investment firm, oil & gas co, etc) can be in play. And of course it is incredibly simple for them to purchase a significant stake in a company through intermediaries and still keep below the notification level.
Low-valued companies with strong assets and no significant holders are at great risk of this behavior - so are companies where a small number of ii's have a controlling stake. You see patterns of the shares price being held down as they accumulate, they will use every trick in the book to get as many shares as possible for perhaps 6 - 12 months. They then propose a buy out at a laughable number, but at a premium to the current price (another great reason to bash the life out of it).
It goes for a vote and since they secretly control a significant block of voting, it will go through. Technically illegal but almost impossible to see and therefore prove. They don't even need a controlling interest, since every 'new' investor will vote yes as they'll get a nice double digit % profit. And loads of others will still be worried about all the FUD the purchasing company themselves will be spreading, so happy to 'get out'.
The buyer picks up a many multi-billion £ asset for a couple of hundred million.
Obviously could be a nonsense theory, but I personally think it's extremely naive to believe that anyone looking to buy the asset won't do everything they can to get it for as small a number as possible. Why on earth do people think some benevolent purchaser will come in and offer $5bn if they don't have to?