Member Info for fatsuperman

Steward, it's not about overly positive or overly negative. It is simply that one week he will proclaim 'the lithium boom is just starting', and the following week 'lithium is a dead end, sodium ion will eat it's breakfast'. Seems pretty straightforward to understand to me, yet you keep missing the point.

Air pressing? :)

Depressing of course

Exactly. It is not the trading it that is odious. It’s the pretence. The fact people come here and want to ‘debate’ all the risks and bad points, in some fake attempt to make sure everyone is considering this.

It’s utter nonsense. The comments are posted with the sole intention of air pressing the price to get a buy in for the next trade. He doesn’t care about any of it apart from as an angle to make these inane posts.

It's not an opinion though Halo. That is exactly what he wants you to think... 'oh just someone there with an opinion, differs to mine perhaps, but he's making some good points...'

He exists here SOLELY to get people to worry, so that some might sell. For what ends, who knows, but quite possibly to get a cheaper price. You only need to go back through his posts on the board to see how he sometimes suddenly changes his tune. And then shortly after, starts talking again about all these random concerns.

I genuinely don't mind people having contrary opinions to me. But I cannot stand the deceit. I can't believe people still defend it.

Acker you are at it again lol

Do you know over how long lithium battery tech has been developed? Any alternative is decades away - including sodium which is hugely attractive as it should slot in nicely to current manufacturing etc.

Na-ion isn’t replacing Li-ion in any of our investment horizons. And certainly not yours, which tend to be measured in hours, rather than years.

Yet another tedious de-ramp

Similar, although mine was also because I was too busy trying to look awesome. Just rolled over to them, covered in mud and shouting "You lads lost?". Then I did the panic yanking thing when you try to take your foot 'off' the peddle, only to remember you have to twist.

They just shook their heads and cycled off I think.

Love it Bolton. I was at Bedgebury a few years ago, and happened across a few guys looking lost. I cruised over to help them out, and exactly like you, I did a slow-motion fall onto my side. Right in the middle of them. They just looked down at me, disgusted.

Well there is a '1' in 10p... so perhaps with a little patience, we will exceed 10k BOPD and a PE of 20... and then it's over to Shaa for the big moment

Once the prospectus is published, which hopefully we see prior to re-listing, then the excitement will reach fever-pitch.

I suppose the downside is that the usual ramp fest prior to news won't happen, as we are suspended.

I guess that won't matter much to many here, who are probably planning to hold mid to long-term holders, and waiting for production rate to increase and a few periods of revenues reported, which should start to see us jump up the PE scale

Big Bear, I read it a couple of times and initially felt the same of you, but I'm not so sure now. Remember that this notification is from the drilling company, not whoever their current client is. They are basically pointing out that they won't have a gap in their work, as the new contract commences straight after their current one. It is a bit vague though... I think if they'd said it's an 'extension' of the current contract there would be no uncertainty.

I am perfectly well able to ignore you, it doesn't affect me. But as you are here, offering your wisdom as a free service to all the people looking in on Prem, I figured I'd offer my advice for free as well.

Yes indeed... you are very pro the CEO up to the point an RNS is published, then you get out as it rises. Then you talk down the CEO, company and share in general until you feel there is a good buy in price, then you are pro the CEO again. In an endless, embarrassing loop of deceit, flim flam and chicanery.

I suppose I should applaud you for being so transparent, but I think you'd have a little more honour if you just kept quiet when you were out. Let it drift on it's own?

Is there a point you are actually going to make at some stage?

I think LSE should prefix every one of your posts with an indicator to let all readers know if you are in (and hence posting positive messages), or out (and hence posting vague doom-mongering tripe). It should be relatively easy for the absolute dumbest of algorithms to figure out your pattern.

Do you ever embarrass yourself?

ALL of PREMs assets are managed under independent companies within the group. It is utterly normal. As well you know Acker

I'm sure ii's like any company, will want to get the most bang for their buck. But do we genuinely believe that if they think this is a great opportunity, they will wait around for the price to drop in order to invest? Surely once they review the forthcoming prospectus, they will have a long-term outlook and will see enormous upside from whatever the open price?

Or am I being naïve here and should face reality that there is as much manipulation as can be gotten away with!?

Not strong on critical thinking are you? The company have laid out why they wanted those funds; in order to accelerate production. If they tried to do that through Atomic revenue the ramp up would be far, far slower.

COPL at Atomic is a case is speculate to accumulate

It's plain ignorance. The education system in Zimbabwe is the best in Africa, huge potential if they can get their economy moving / deal with the corruption. They've got all the foundations they need to take advantage of a new wave of energy.

Happy to let all these cowardly mice quit and drown, so that we can use the accumulation of their corpses to clamber out of the bowl, dripping in glorious cream.

Meet halfway, pint of gin I reckon

Absolutely agree with Shure on this. There is no issue with the miners carrying on for now - the local PR and noise is not worth the hassle of doing anything about it - subject to any legal responsibilities we may have on the land (which I think is not an issue).

In due course, if we end up wanting to re-open/build a mine where they are working, then they'll have to move on. We'll want to handle it carefully, but from a 'other people stealing our gold perspective'; it's not remotely an issue.

Yes, this award is for prospecting. We need to complete DFS in this timeline (easily achieved) and then we get a further license