RE: Q4 playback4 Feb 2021 17:01
Thanks Sanchez .. interesting listen ... a few notes I made
Q about the 35 day shutdown - is this going to be regular ? FM said it could produce more, but wanted to priorotise reliability. Underestimated the constraints around the Salt Roast element and need to upgrade. Also in the Leech element there has been some variability (mostly all of this is downstream from the Kiln is where the bottlenecks are)
Q There was a question I thouoght a bit vague. I took it to be about future Capex costs identified, and FM sort of answered but couched with 'well there may be debottlenecking' type activities.
Meyer asked about the growing disconnect between production & sales .... asked about the inter-site transfers. A bit of a waffly answer really: just spoke and taking materials and processing at different sites, but I am guessing this is not what Meyer was really asking about. Did say it is not about obscuring anything, just about efficient operations. Tania did go into more detail about internal sales processes, but really nothing of note
*** I wonder if this optimises the costs by selling internally at a lower value (lower level of processing at a site only 74% owned) so a higher margin on Vanchem (100% basis) is achieved ?
He asked about the BE Electrolyte plant & pipeline + lease financing. Not a lot said really, all future news although the Mini-grid will involve electrolyte that is leased - serves as an example for future investors. More news to come in due course
Question on run-rates and balance between H1/H2. Basically, expect more back end loaded. Did mention and emphasise a lot of heavy current rainfalls and alluded to management issues of some dam they have. This and the 35 day shut, expect H2 numbers in production to be rather better than H1
Vanchem gets better numbers and cost base from 2nd half of year and better next year
Picked up on a comment made about some chemicals/flake that could be conversed to other products post period - I felt this was really about clarification and nothing hidden in the RNS
Made the point he wants to 'improve' on cost transparency. Mentioned Largo and its single product from a signle operation. At Bushveld, there are two sites and multiple products. So has been tricky to be consistent and transparent on costs. Interesting he said happy to speak with the brokers on how best to do this
A sort of waffly question about elevated cost guidance and is the expectation that the 3rd kiln operations leading into 2022 will bring it down. Answer was really about optimisation and stuff in the future. Also spoke of Mokopane being closer to Vanchem. Expects 2022 will have an improved cost basis
FM Summed up by saying the focus 2021 is improving Vametco reliability and improving operations at Vanchem. Then went on to paint the picture of a lot going on at BE and implied quite a bit of news coming regarding Invinity, Enerox and general BE operations.