Member Info for faramog

interesting ... and where would $180m be coming from ?

yes @Manished ... players in the game often do trades to create momentum .. then just unwind them. Allows them to manipulate the price down or up depending on their bent

where is he saying that ... not seen it on his twatter feed

there are few choices for an early high risk small miner on AIM .... the mess is created by the lack of proper FCA oversight - they just allow the wild west to happen

an RTO would need a vote - so we get notice !

Thanks for what ?... Can anyone actually recall anything PH have done for Bushy ?

SPa's days are coming to an end as well. They are not a broker for main board companies.

Tidy up before a re-list/re-brand I wonder

Well Alfa... Would certainly be in line with the persistent mood music of big BE news coming....

or as in the Oxford Hub where Lithium is circa 90% of the storage, Vanadium is used as a longer term smoother to maintain the life of the Lithium - all complementary.

But I suspect the VRFB technology will establish itself bigger and faster once seen in operation. It has clear long term cost and recyclability benefits

what are you blathering about 'oh new single post poster' .. the RNS said nothing about revenue ... just a generic troll post !

You do realise that huge SP moves can and do happen even when companies are loss making...

Just look at FAR !

I'm not bragging @Beginerman .... just giving some context and my money where my mouth is ! Others (like Alfa) have more than 3x my holding .... they continue to put their money where their mouth is as well

As for moaning ... for fools who are too lazy to open their eyes or too lazy to actually do some research

Go look in the past RNS's .. Q1-3 figures for sales, costs etc are there. BBN on Twitter has some Q4 analysis (but we get the actual numbers late Jan). FCF you will have to wait for the audited accounts .. mostly as we are not privy to the internal details to work it out sufficiently well.

Welcome brand new poster .. and why do these two numbers matter so much to you ?

"Now we all know what happened next … the V price rise (as predicted by Fortune)"
- I do not recall FM at any time saying he expected Vanadium pricing to hit $120 (or indeed anywhere near it) ... Happy to see the evidence

"Now you argue that the rise in share price had nothing to do with Fortune, so tell me this. If Fortune hadn’t acted quickly, negotiated a great deal to buy Vametco and instantly become a producer where do you think the share price would have gone in 2018 if BMN were not producing Vanadium? The 48p sp was reached only because Fotune had bought into Vametco, seizing the opportunity when it arose, and thus allowing BMN to profit from rising V prices."

- You conflate 'I think therefore I am' ... the latter is a consequence of the former and whilst FM correctly saw the Vanadium potential, he in no way predicted such a massive vanadium price rise. But it is hard to argue that the pattern of the SP does not pretty much mirror Vanadoum pricing. Positioning the company put us in the right place at the right time.

So what has happened in the past 6 months as Vanadium pricing has steadily risen by over 30% ... where is the reflection in SP... where is FM's hand in it ?

If you had not noticed (clearly), I was basically agreeing with you. I know ... hard to believe ... but FM positioned Bushy in the right place at the right time to catch (the first) wave. The net result has been that expansion costs could partly be made by profit instead of dilution: a point often overlooked. But they did up their salaries and packages to match the new found wealth. A point that for the past 3 years has hardly been earned (various views are had).

Please don't spoil your posts by ending in such a pompous manner - we all have views and to say 'read my posts properly' is pretty rude. I could say 'Tuche'

and @Beginerman .. "can influence others with their opinion" ... well so what ... PI's need to do their own research, form their own views. Otherwise they become poorer.... remember, for me to make money, someone else has to not make money ! I bought my first really bing tranche at around 2p and caught the wave to 8p.... that was research, looking at the various opinions and coming to my own conclusion. I may not agree with the often firm (aggressive is a bit harsh) way Pdub posts and comments, but he is perfectly entitled to offer his perspective. As is anyone. You on the other hand just moan about that

Well actually Pdub, you rather inferred it was all down the FM.. I think differently ... And the overlay of vanadium pricing to BMN sp rather suggests that

I mean... Had the Chinese not spiked the price so much with their double whammy of upping rebar standards and shutting the most polluting processors down, their strategic reserves would not have been pretty much wiped.

FM's 'genius' if you want to characterise that way was recognising the value of vanadium as a commodity and its future potential.

As FM had such impact on the SP 3-4 years ago (as you claim), why has it been a steady drop to circa 9p then ?

As for weak statements... No such thing.. other views are available.

Predominantly the SP has mirrored the vanadium price movement... None of the MMS or fund holders put any value at all on double plant, BE, Mokopane or any of the other stuff.

Yes if FM had not done the original deal then arguable none of it happens, but the meteoric rise has little to do with FMs subsequent actions and everything to do with vanadium spot pricing

IMO... Other views are available

Lb21.. there is.. it is called the AGM... The last one FM did not have an easy ride some of it

Last digger tweet ????? What is that hippyD

https://twitter.com/Share_Talk/status/1473316613139025922

I guess, not having a plan @Agri would be why several millions are being spent as we speak building an Electrolyte plant.

Anyone can have a view, but try not to be such clown about it

especially since the sale price and volume has been rising for 6 months !!