Member Info for Far2L8

Bilbs, please, you might have a new drum which you want to beat, but some of us don't want to listen. Don't get yourself filtered, because in amongst the chaff and lectures to us all, you occasionally make some good comments. It's just that this is not one of them.

The end is nigh for the cover up of methane leaks, soon there is going to be no hiding place and about time.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/in-push-to-find-methane-leaks-satellites-gear-up-for-the-hunt

Oh for goodness sake give it a rest Bilbs, after all it's all conjecture on your part, some of us have faith that they know what they are doing.

Sorry bilbo, you're on your own on this one. There are thems that shout and there are thems that do. I think ITM are the latter.

Where did they go?

The article is rather muddled and counter intuitive.

What if the damages are potentially so big that it would potentially bankrupt UCAP/Maxwell? They may well be working on a solution whereby they will allow themselves to be taken over by CAP-XX in full and final payment.

Many investors in this share have been following hydrogen for some years and are well aware of the market as a whole. The problem with a young technology, keeping abreast of all innovative companies is nigh on impossible for an independent investor. That's why this fund is so attractive. A lot of us are already invested in companies like ITM Power and Ceres Power and will be aware of the type of innovative, but risky up and coming companies, but unless you are very wealthy and brave, you can't invest in them all. This fund allows you to do that which is the main reason why I'm invested IN HGEN.

HL charges can be higher than ii, it depends on how much your entire portfolio is valued at. If you have a high value one they give it with one hand and take it back with the other. If you have a low value one you are the gainer. HL charges are based on a percentage, ii charge a fixed fee. You have to do your own calculations. I would end up worse off with HL within the year.

Does

Could be that they are not yet fully invested. Doesn't anyone know if they are?

I suspect that there are too many interested parties for there to be a steal. If someone comes in with a low offer I'm guessing others will immediately offer higher and a bidding war would ensue. To be ssuccessful , the bid would have to be big enough to deter others from entering the fray. So for that reason I think a steal is out. I'm still against them selling though, because I firmly belive that the supercap market is on the cusp of explosive growth.

TD. On a different topic do you have any Intel on the above? I have searched their site and can't find any technical info... But, from the number of kegs in circulation I would think they wouldn't just rely on batteries. The Smart Container Company makes them.

It's not ramping to declare true facts about a company. But I think that speculation about the financial woes could be somewhat questionable.

Doesn't take much to bring the glass half empties out does it TD?

Fortunately safety in hydrogen has evolved in industry over a much longer period than large storage modern batteries. Evolution of safety over a long period based on experience and accidents makes for a more robust set of procedures, together with lessons learnt in other flammable gasses. Battery storage on a large scale has only just begun this perilous journey.

Had my fingers crossed it wouldn't launch with a fall.

You wouldn't enjoy it Bilbs, they are full of right wing wealth flaunters ;-)

Self driving caravans, now there's a thought. :-)

I second that, but in an internal combustion engine, you keep the sounds and uncertainty but without the Co2. It would help development of the elimination of Nox emissions as well.