Member Info for fairdealer20

The problem here is statements last year which were forward-looking as evidenced by ,"we will easily realise the brokers valuation in time", are now dismissed. So how can a Pundit who is concerned about the wealth of his fellow being, be believed?

As admitted the previous wise approach is now rubbish, so how can the current view be regarded as anywhere near correct.

Prophets are best left in the Old Testament.

Jekyll and Hyde or Simon??

contd statement goes on:-

"I can't see this being equity as current significant shareholders will not want major dilution. It will be a JV, funded by significant shareholders"

A Knowledgeable and Committed Shareholder made this statement:-

"It's not a massive gamble, the co have stated that investors have the money to fund the drills I'm guessing as a last resort so there is no gamble that this will not be drilled. It's just a matter of how it will be financed. Therefore we will easily realise the brokers valuation in time. Even if for example we get half way to the brokers valuation, that's still almost 10p a share each"

Guess who??

GB it is highly unlikely shorters could operate in a stock with only 20milion shares in issue.

Trent there are millions who agree. It beggars belief how anyone who knows anything about business would ever consider going into a negotiation with little or no Aces up ones sleeve. Ours(UK) were shown almost at the beginning of talks. In my experience People and Business's can live with decisions however unpalatable, but indecision undermines confidence totally.

Frankly I would not give these people a job with a broom, as they would not know where too start.

Just replace a1m1 for Fairdealer to get it straight.

Members here and elsewhere will have taken note of your historic posts which give an accurate and factual understanding of an unstable mindset.

I signed the petition last week have you??

Too help, Mike007 started this thread last night and suggested members of a like mind submit complaints.

I chipped in this morning with information regarding the complaint protocols if Market Abuse is suspected.

Posts have disappeared including one I entered at 7.55 giving details of the FCA's address ( I have since re-posted)

Reactions of some members are here for all to see until they are possibly removed.

The frustration of other Members here is understandable, however suggest they view the board on ADVFN ( I am NOT a member) where the same activities are occurring and are irritating subscribers there too.

IF manipulation is/has occurred it must be addressed for the good of all.

Alledged market abuse complaints are dealt with by:-

market.abuse@fca.org.uk

Complaints must identify the nature of the claimed abuse (posts, social media records etc). Claimed events should align with Company News, Market Movements etc giving timelines.

Multiple complaints regarding the same subject will be investigated where as Individual complaints rate low priority.

Send emails to the above address and request acknowledgment.

Complaints and investigations are Confidential. Complainants will only hear from the FCA if further information is required and at conclusion of the investigation, which may involve the Police if the FCA suspect Criminality is/has occurred.

Posters should be aware FCA have direct powers to establish the identity of any Poster of interest to them. They alongside the Police can compel Platforms to release information which is normally covered by the Data Protection Regulations.

Gunthorpe, you are baffled, imagine most here are likewise. Too have informative posts removed which are seemly resonating with Admin raises some serious questions.

a1m1, if you have nothing too worry about why are you acting so defensively?

phil... and others need to be aware my post at 7.55 has disappeared. This is the post giving full details of where complaints should be addressed.

LSE are acting in a way which is not conducive to open debate, compromises it's claimed impartiality and adds suspicion the culprits of alledged abuse are known to LSE.

Will re-post earlier information shortly

Amtech, since July 2016 the FCA were given greater powers and likewise subject too increased Accountabilty.

If complainants are unhappy about the outcome of Complaints, whether known or not, there are escalated levels which can be undertaken.

In the first instance wait for the outcome of the initial Complaints to the FCA, which needs to be a level that cannot be ignored i.e 1 complaint would likely remain at the bottom of the in-tray.

phil.... absolutely correct. What I can add to the previous information is since July 2016 the powers of FCA were greatly increased that not only are the Police required to take an interest, any Facilitator of system(s) which allow abuse are subject to Investigation and probable penalties.

What is the address for the FCA's Market Abuse Team?

Do wonder why another K227 shares have been sold adding to the 50,000 a few weeks ago
Is someone cashing for Tax purposes before 5th April?

I defended!!!! You really have a problem, big problem. Were suspended here. The other Board have worked out your agenda and yet LSE have allowed you back peddling the same old rubbish.

As advised some days ago the Major Shareholder's team will be noting all of your allegations written both here and on ADVFN. You have shown NO respect or care in what you post and therefore should be prepared for what may follow.

You don't have a clue otherwise would know there are protocols to be in place before a drill is undertaken. None least the availability of a rig. Rig demand currently is very high because of the increased activity in the NS.

Do you homework and stop inventing and saying what if this, what if that. The fact is you don't know but continue to surplant your garbage designed to undermine.

Get a life or a better payed job.

Buster read your own posts. You claimed Shell are not confident and now admit the decision will be made before the end of 2020.

Christ get a Brain Surgeon.