Member Info for fairdealer20

Not good enough. You make statements now completely at odds with previous on the basis "I am no longer Bullish on CLNR"

OK explain to readers your actions on Twitter last Friday?

Back to your insulting behaviour towards Algy Cluff OBE, what has he done to you?

Answers please

Ah, invention now. a1m1 you have history for all to see.

Again what is the meaning of hype or do you deny making the Ramped statement "10-20p in the next year"?

You insulted Algy Cluff on the 19th June 2018, no ambiguity there in black and white.

You can weasel a way out as much as you like, it's very clear you have a grudge against Algy Cluff. What has he done to you?

Who wrote?

"Potential value here is mind boggling,easily 10-20p, in the next year"

What is the meaning of hype a1m1?

another gem, from the pen of our Resident Guru

"Cluff is clearly a very nasty man"

a1m1 what has Algy Cluff done to you? Come on tell the truth!

Mike a lot too happen yet. 2252 Shell to cover Seismic Survey this summer and Evaluate Data within first half of 2020. Decision to drill will then be taken and could happen last quarter of 2020 or 1st Q 2021. No cost to CLNR until decision to Drill.

2437, if Shell take up Option(28thApril) a Drill programmed for Mid 2020.

On this basis CLRN have No call for significant funds for a Year unless other Licences are Explored in the meantime, which again could have Farm-In's and consequential income.

Guess a lot to happen and matters should become clearer after 28th April.

GB thanks for the advice. Have to discipline myself ( spend too much time in front of a screen). Anyhow have checked the link Urraca directed me too and must confess the numbers do require some qualification. Understand Dicks....point, however JOG's share of drill cost is circa £1m that leaves a hell of a lot to cover any contribution towards 3D seismic survey, etc. JOG have a team of experts who cover most technical desktop work. Hope the Funding is being utilised towards Cortina. No doubt statement of accounts will clarify.

Phil...like everything else he does not have a clue. reminds me of a guy in my year who constantly came up questions Teacher had informed days before.. he just wanted attention and when Teacher suggested his mother should be asked, he said she won't speak to me and send me to bed. After he finished at school his mother threw him out.

Looks like, as expected some big buys towards close.

Don't you know? Google it

Urraca thanks, should have searched.

Phil... the substance of your post is agreed, unfortuneately all the fallacious, engineered statements are designed, as you have discovered, too scare Holders too Sell and Buyers to avoid. The intended outcome to create uncertainty and a reduction in SP. Grammar and it's usage can be challenged as we have discovered often is, however the general thrust of debate should be factual and supported by tangible evidence. Here we have unscientific projestions which when questioned get NO supporting evidence, just bluster, insults often by innuendo, which adds Zilch to any sensible debate.
The Culprits of misinformation should be reminded of their past statements which took a completely opposing view to now for instance who wrote, "Potential value here is a mind-boggling, easily 10-20p in the next year"

Guess who??

Imminent was a term used on another board last year, where I challenged the writer as it is a very imprecise word and certainly not specific. It could mean tomorrow, next week, next month even next year a bit like "soon"

Most of us know a Fund raise is probable but not definite as other events could overtake the need, i.e Shell may buyin a greater consideration than already agreed, CLNR could even find a Buyer ( this was being openly ramped last year). Even if the raise occurs there are a number of methods Funds could be raised which could or not involve existing shareholders. Algy Cluff has always made it clear as did Graham Swindells the intention is too grow Shareholder Value.

The end of April should give us more when Shell have determined their intentions.

Have Equinor's Contracted Drill costs been validated? Are they open to view?
If not how has GB discovered?

phil......a placing is possible in time as is a take-over. How Shell react during the next month will shed further light.

It is interesting how some posters were claiming a £20m raise a few days ago but have now revised the projection following the background of JOG's raise in 2017 where the £25m raise there was used as a benchmark.

Utterly fallacious as the Resident Guru now accepts.

D0berman just don't go on ADVFN. The same problem exists( I am not a Subscriber) and some posters use rather more colourful language.

Others may suggest other BB's which are more sober!!

a1m1 prevaricate as much as you like but you know Shareholder Approval is required for any Proposal not conditioned within the Articles of Association and compliant with Company Law.

If you believe otherwise there is nothing anyone here can do to help.

Repeat my question yet again, as an Animal Lover ( do you work for the RSPCA?) how should "Trapped Bulls" act now?

Answer please?

a1m1 in spite of several explanations you have difficulty to grasp how Company Law operates which is strange as you completely accepted the process last summer and regarded a raise as extremely positive. Now you are trying your best(not good enough) to twist and distort rules and undertakings. Lets be clear whatever spin you put on it EVERY Shareholder is circulated and asked to Vote on a Proposition. Usually a simple majority is needed. Do you know what level of support is required where CLNR is concerned?
What's your answer? Do you know?

I repeat ( a bit like you) if you are so concerned about Cluff's arrangements, write to Graham Swindells who will happily give an answer as you clearly do not believe what others say.

The question remains as a "Trapped Bull" what would you be doing now?

Scooby......they work in packs. There is the Lance-Corporal who does all the donkey work but really has a very low level of knowledge just typists cramp. Then the Corporal, who appears occasionally when the scivvie gets bogged down. He(Corporal) will come across as an affable supportive "Officer", who gently( sometimes pulls rank) corrects his servant. Then there is Sargent who rarely appears ( often away on Jollies), but when he does will provide support to his underlings on the face of it, but behind scenes gives often his Lance-Corporal a real rollocking.

With apologies too any current or retired Army personell.

Pilgrim what a Lu Lu you are. We give you fundamental guidance which is disputed, takes almost 12 hours to respond...guess you have been absorbed in paperwork and now continue to dispute. If you have good reasons to dispute the Shareholder Agreement, why did you not raise those concerns last June when actually you were highly supportive of the process. You are a strange guy!!

If you are so un happy why don't you contact Graham Swindells for an in depth explanation, he will no doubt respond in an appropriate manner.

Hypothetically, as a "Trapped Bull" how would you proceed with the stock you hold in Cluff??

So by definition you admit de-ramping!!!

and as you have been told several times now, a Company with Shareholders must gain approval for any Equity increase. Approvals will either be contained within Articles of Association or Special resolution requiring Approval of the Members.

Is that clear and understandable?

Suggest you bury your head in the Company's Corporate Documents which you may believe???

Could be more B&B getting close to 5th April.

Large Buys in the last hour. Confidence!