RE: Re: TEO30 May 2022 12:03
Apologies for third message but the fact RY has stated it is ready, now means this knowledge is in the public domain and shove the bidders that may have to pay more it is what is is. Had a sensible offer been submitted it may not matter by now, they played their hand it failed time to progress more value, not appease someone for a potential offer.
What angers me is RY admitting the roads etc will be an issue and we should accept the offer as they will never produce. So by means of these stupid comments it has effectively devalued the asset regardless if he is genuine or not!