RE: Oil cut15 Apr 2024 15:22
Scssscscsss. The stuff I am making up comes from the rns, so perhaps you should direct your comments to the company that is spending your money if the figures are made up. I also said it was for a single 20ft frac and that the figures were only reliant on there actually being 50bbls of oil produced in a day which currently we all know wasn't actually the case. They most likely had a little spurt of oil that moved the dial momentarily to a flow that equated to 50bbls a day--big difference, but I gave them the benefit of the doubt and called it 50 a day--because thats what they implied. There were several comments and handbag fights going on about oil cut so I attempted to put some sense around the figures the company have provided. If they made the figures up then call the FCA or somebody. I also noticed that the rns states that they were under nitrogen lift for 100% of the time, yet they also say it was a natural flow to surface. It can't really be both so give em a call and ask which version is right. Have a look at the oil and gas definition of contingent resources, it is a step up from prospective which is a bonus for shareholders but still means that it is not yet commercially recoverable for some reason or another, it is also based upon estimation using standard oilfield parameters, therefore in other words you could say its another made-up guesstimate figure. 88 is no different to any other miner or oil explorer, I'm not having a dig at them but until the barrels are churned out and sold, its all just guessology--and a long way off from this point in time.