RE: MM Question28 Sep 2020 21:44
BB- you haven’t seen the post from Adam Hargreaves then ?
The primary aims of the study encompassed the assessment of the safety and tolerability of VAL201. This study has documented that VAL201 has demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile. The lack of a MTD should not be mis-interpreted as not fulfilling the requirements of delineating the useable safety range of the drug (as some have alluded to this morning). It looks to be very kind in these respects, which is great news for patients. This is what we want; drugs that work and drugs that also don’t destroy the soul with side-effects. God knows, in oncology we need them