Member Info for extracover46

Have just sent them a terse message about "progress" re Han-k and suggest others do the same.

ir@alienmetals.uk

Probably will have the same impact as blowing in the wind but the more that contact them the better perhaps as it shows PI investor concerns.

Just got back an auto ack so they got my message.

Please do it.

BW

C/B

Does anyone ever apologise these days for c--king things up. Especially on boards like this where everyone seems to be 100% confident that they are right!

He/she/ would gain some future Brownie points if the decent thing was done.

You can assume that I am a grumpy 70 plusser. We regularly c--ked up but then apologised when we got put straight.

Cheers all.

Black G

Your post of 20/08

Is it worth mailing -if you hadn't already-Ben Simons or Peter Jacobs whose contact details are at the bottom of the RNS dated 12/08.

Just a thought-as they specifically are concerned with investor relations!

Bw

What evidence is there for massive director and board member selling?

Jason has said more than once in interviews that he is in for the long haul and isn't going anywhere.

Why would they sell now right at the start of something that could be transformative.

There are always risk factors especially in the extractive industries and moreover in countries where the possibility of future obstructions to progress implementation could raise their ugly heads.

With £19 bn in the ground even getting a 1% return gets us to a valuation of £190 million.

Jimz

I read it as a two stage process with 20 m shares being issued initially and fairly quickly with the bulk of the shares and the funding coming a bit later once all the legal stuff was finally sorted.

From the RNS of 13/08 under the heading "Admission" didn't it mention that admission of a shed load of shares was expected on or around the 20th (i.e, today)

Could help explain the drop other than scare stories by de-rampers?

Financials looked good and int rate movements working in company's favour.

Is there something in the macro political environment with the new gov maybe causing brown pants in the private landlord rental sector?

Is the correct response HH.

Instant gratification is the over-arching mantra today unfortunately,

Patience needed.

RYA 41 euros

EZJ £69

Says it all.

RYA running hard to stand still and doesn't have the EZJ back up of the package business to support flight revenues.relies solely on

The doom mongers are certainly out in force at the moment and any good news is wrapped up in widows weeds (showing my age now).

Fail to see why the market is so negative and investors are running for the hills when media plus travel pundits are pointing out the bleeding obvious- that airports are rammed,demand is there and some operators (but not EZJ) are short of planes for a number of reasons. Prices will be higher but people will bite the bullet and still cough up in order to go on an/o/s holiday in the sun.

O'Dreary is a complete kn/b.

Correction 5% of 3 billion is 150 million.

Equates to around 60p per share.

Time for my pills!

If we assume that we discount the value in the ground by at least 95% to allow for all the costs involved in getting to selling the stuff, that still values EST (just Verkhuba) at £300m.

Present valuation of EST is c£8.7 m

Any thoughts?

Well worth a look. CEO a cut above the rest.Articulate and clear thinker.

Shame the market seems to think otherwise.

Inflation will though if you are unlucky enough to win anything.

I think you know what I meant to say-the first line could do with tidying up such as "we know now that the 3 week old baby that died was one of twins born at 32 weeks"

The earlier reporting seemed to indicate that this was maybe a sole birth?

Cheers

Apparently one of the twins died; the other is now 4 years old and presumably OK. Whilst the article in the ST doesn't give all the facts it stated that the births happened at 32 weeks (8 weeks preterm).

The babies would have had to remain in hospital until they were deemed OK to go home. The formula was obviously given to them whilst in hospital.

The (weaker?) twin died after 3 weeks with NEC. I'm not a medic but the assumption has to be that at this point at what amounted to 35 weeks out of a 40 week normal pregnancy term both babies would still have been under the medical supervision of the hospital/s. I'm wondering given that NEC has been known about for yonks why the medics haven't also been sued?

It's def million

Sharp activity well covered in ST Bus Section 3/12.

Long term issues around charging for "advice"-some of which never really happened but still charged for.

I seemed to recall from the last Presentation that the break even price for Met coal was said to be $191. So 220 odd still gives some headway?

Perhaps someone has got a sniff of FY results due next Thursday?