Member Info for extracover46

If only the BOE had any proverbials and elected to drop int rates at their next meeting.

Virtually all the inflation stuff coming our way is externally generated-can they not see that?

Perhaps some of the continued decline is down to the deterrent factor of the queue inducing EU new passport checks which have been well reported.

Agree Iran excuse is bollo!

Tend to agree but worst fear is that some residents -given encouragement by ambulance casing lawyers--will milk this as far as it will go including no doubt appeals for comp from those of a "nervous disposition " who were stressed by the experience.

At least there was no spillage-as that would be a whole different ball game.

West Coast Silver closed up 11% today.

Politicians and academics have been debating for years how to decouple the cost of gas generated electricity from that produced by cheaper renewables,

Don't hold your breath waiting for Reeves and Mortimer to come up with anything that will benefit us in the UK any time soon!

The 29.65 m late reported trade today at 15.11 is surely a buy??

According to Stock Analysis the last time VTY was this low was in Aug 2012 so not even Covid brought it down to this level.

Moronic response by MMs. Herd mentality.

It is now below the dark days of Nov 24 when VTY revealed accounting problems at its Southern Division and quite rightly investors were spooked at the time into assuming that would be other nasties hiding in the woodwork.That did not materialise.

It is almost as if every time the word "challenging" appears in an RNS then it automatically triggers a 10-20% drop in the sp.

The guy is leaving in 12 months time -not this March for Pete's sake!

Funny/suspicious that shorts should have increased noticeably last week (reported Weds)-so someone was in the know before today's RNS.

Reducing surely?

I still have the feeling that the negative reviews etc have largely come from that segment of the ED cohort who were never going to benefit from the product but nevertheless out of desperation perhaps, and allied to the risks of going down the pill route, went ahead anyway and tried it.

For example, those who have had prostate surgery and ended up with nerve damage stand little or no chance. Others better qualified than me can no doubt point to other infirmities (not just old age) that substantially reduce the efficacy of this product.

If repeat sales are weak then the messaging needs to be clearer. This can function clearly as an enhancement/recreational product for those with or w/o mild ED.

Just wondering why we are paying out for what appears to be less than professional marketing nous!

We will only get the full 1.25 m dollars if Avanti fail to cough up by 31/12/25.

Thanks Coco for picking this up and the Gruniad (!) clear explanation as to the error which stops ill founded comments from proliferating.

Just hoping that the new management team can address one of the many problems with this product.

It should never have been "promoted" as a life savers to guys who have had serious prostate problems that required surgery and in some cases that left them because of nerve damage 100% impotent and maybe incontinent as well. I have put promoted in inverted commas as there was a strong ED message around the launch and subsequent communications from FUM.

Guys who have had prostate cancer and surgery in their 40s-60s feel they have been cheated and will jump at anything that offers a solution to problems resulting from perhaps less than delicate surgery (does happen). Negative reviews about waste of money and doesn't work inevitably swamp the good news message boards.

It should be more clearly aimed at those who seek enhancement/fun and those who suffer from occasional non surgical ED although of course there will be some fortunate ones who have come away from the knife relatively unscathed!

The way that the product is physically positioned also seems to need attention. It isn't rocket science and clearly past mgmt have a lot to answer for.

Thanks for your response Monty and acknowledgement that the 10% "rule" doesn't apply to daily sp movements.

As someone getting a bit long in the tooth now (late 70s) and so far having avoided prostate malignancy I can understand why for many guys the thought of a magic bullet to cure/overcome ED following major prostate surgery-sometimes clumsily done with resulting serious damage to surrounding nerve tissue/endings etc can lead very quickly to dashed expectations and thus negative reviews from men for who realistically had no hope of ever achieving an ER again.

This journey that FUM has been on for almost 2 decades could well become a marketing case study of how not to promote and position a new product in a gap in the marketplace. The whole arena and ethos around the product messaging seemed to be aimed at those who have had major prostate issues including surgery, but there is a huge market out there for men of all ages who occasionally can't always rise to the occasion-forgive the obvious pun (time for my pills).

The very recent Viagra ads on TV make my point -clearly targetting the "enhancement" market. FUM can play a major part here as enhancement pills can have serious side effects but FUM gels do not. I forget the exact wording attached to the recent V ads but it implied that the effects could last for up to 36 hours. I think the mind boggles at this prospect -that would certainly be a day to remember!!

Sorry for wittering.

Enjoy the day.

077

Agree.

Fairly obvious it's being kept down for a cheap sale.

If you have the time try and read the AIM regs that I referred to-no way was that RNS of the 11th at all necessary as everyone-especially LTHs -sussed what had driven the sp movement.

Hang in there-first bought in at 40 p or so back in 2007 when it was all about trying to concept prove. Talk about value destruction (OK less shares then).

We need to put this RNS of the 11th and the debate about it back in its box.

I have been through the AIM rules (01/01/21) and it says NOTHING about having to report a swing of 10% in a share price.

So that RNS was totally unnecessary and smacks of a despairing parting shot by a person or persons "unknown".

What para 12 of the AIM rules does say is that the company must release an RNS if there has been a substantial transaction of 10% or more that has exceeded any of the "class tests" which are clearly defined in Schedule 3. Schedule 4 requires the company to issue an RNS when the 10% has been breached.

I really thought that this might have picked up a bit this p.m. but there you go -we live to fight another day

Buys appear to be twice the sells yet it is still being forced down.

Off the point really, as don't want to encourage political stuff on this site but did some digging a while ago (not easy to get a straight answer) but the total number of GB of votes for Labour in 2024 was much much less than when Corbyn was standing for PM.. So despite huge seat advantage the foundations for this gov-to use a HB analogy-appear to be on shallow foundations!

Short term response to MJ Gleeson update today-20% fall on a series of mishaps/incompetences!

Clearly lots of weaknesses in the basics here especially POS-Point/s of sales.

Get it sorted FUM-you are paying enough people to do it.