RE: Some might say...8 Jul 2019 17:03
Good RNS. Well done to Kurt. I feel it must be emphasised though, that our application has already (so we've been led to believe prior by Kurt) satisfied all 'necessary' criteria for the concession award. Today's plan of what will happen next, post-licence, should not then, in my opinion, be viewed by the powers that be as further loose criteria for us to satisfy now, in the determination of the granting, or otherwise, of the licence.
In short, I hope the Government will not be encouraged to keep adding hurdles for us to overcome, if we've already adhered to and satisfied the officially stated criteria for a concession award.
I therefore also can't see why the licence has to be granted with certain conditions attached, if we've already satisfied all that is legally required.
The focus, I believe, needs to be shifted from the political back to the legal requirements, even though Kurt's future plan is, on the face of it, superb.
The drag factor with the decision could still exist for us if people start to now attempt to pick holes in Kurt's stated plans. Lol.
We need a clinical end to this saga and a decision. Not more channels for discussion. So I trust Kurt will not be divulging much more, until the licence is with us.
I trust some will appreciate what I'm trying to say.
Good luck all.