RE: Shockingly inappropriate4 Oct 2021 21:48
Jimmy,
It is easy to be the critique without seeking the facts to support your conspiracy. My interview with Stuart supplements the RNS without breaching regulatory rules on inside information. However, I asked a few questions proactive did not. Funnily enough, this happens a lot.
In this interview Stuart was clear, he is open to answering questions from investors, it is part of his role, one which he takes seriously. No doubt, if you could be bothered to approach Stuart with a query, he would be just as helpful to you, just as long as you are not foolish enough to ask for inside information.
beinthelead,
With respect. You don't get access to CEOs and chairmen and get to represent them at investor meetings without gaining some form of credibility. What constitutes credibility in your eyes? A filthy mouth blogger (sorry, journalist) calling ordinary retail investor morons if they do not agree with him?
Credibility should be about integrity, the ability to ask the right questions, and feed this back to investors and potential investors alike, as accurately as possible. I am not suggesting Mr Angry does not have these qualities, either.
Perhaps you mean a platform that has access to HNWI? Indeed, I do, and they are growing in number. Not because I am just another BBM.